Predictive Capacity of Screening Methods for Preeclampsia in Early Pregnancies

Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is a multiorgan and multifactorial disorder that occurs worldwide and is responsible for maternal mortality between 10 to 15% as a direct obstetric cause. Its early prediction would allow us to act in a timely manner to avoid possible complications. Objective: To evaluate the predictive capacity of screening methods. Methods: It is a prospective longitudinal study. the mean gestational age by LCC was 12.6 weeks. in which clinical risk criteria for preeclampsia (major and moderate), mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (IP AU), biomarkers (PIGF and PAPPA) were taken as early predictors. Results: Of the 632 participants who met the inclusion criteria, 62 (9.8%) presented preeclampsia and 570 (90.1%) participants did not develop it. They were grouped by gestational age at delivery and the different markers were applied, obtaining them by combining them in the case of Pregnancies less than 34 weeks a prediction of 88.24% (Low PE p ≤ 0.001 compared to High PE), in pregnancies less than 37 weeks 70% (Low PE p ≤ 0.04 compared to High PE), in pregnancies greater than 37 weeks 68% (Low PE p ≤ 0.003 compared to High PE). Conclusions: The application of the different markers individually is not usually highly effective, compared to their combined application, which in our studies achieves a higher percentage of prediction, especially in early-onset preeclampsia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gynecology Research Reviews & Reports
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47363/jgrrr/2024(6)210
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Capacity of Screening Methods for Preeclampsia in Early Pregnancies

Eduardo Carvalho de Arruda Veiga, Janet Isabel Cherres Pacheco, Ligia Yadira Saltos Gutiérrez, Alicia Ivonne Villacres Herrera et al.
Journal of Gynecology Research Reviews & Reports
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

Predictive Capacity of Screening Methods for Preeclampsia in Early Pregnancies

Eduardo Carvalho de Arruda Veiga, Janet Isabel Cherres Pacheco, Ligia Yadira Saltos Gutiérrez, Alicia Ivonne Villacres Herrera, Pablo Andres Yanez Marcayata
article en

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia (PE) is a multiorgan and multifactorial disorder that occurs worldwide and is responsible for maternal mortality between 10 to 15% as a direct obstetric cause. Its early prediction would allow us to act in a timely manner to avoid possible complications. Objective: To evaluate the predictive capacity of screening methods. Methods: It is a prospective longitudinal study. the mean gestational age by LCC was 12.6 weeks. in which clinical risk criteria for preeclampsia (major and moderate), mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (IP AU), biomarkers (PIGF and PAPPA) were taken as early predictors. Results: Of the 632 participants who met the inclusion criteria, 62 (9.8%) presented preeclampsia and 570 (90.1%) participants did not develop it. They were grouped by gestational age at delivery and the different markers were applied, obtaining them by combining them in the case of Pregnancies less than 34 weeks a prediction of 88.24% (Low PE p ≤ 0.001 compared to High PE), in pregnancies less than 37 weeks 70% (Low PE p ≤ 0.04 compared to High PE), in pregnancies greater than 37 weeks 68% (Low PE p ≤ 0.003 compared to High PE). Conclusions: The application of the different markers individually is not usually highly effective, compared to their combined application, which in our studies achieves a higher percentage of prediction, especially in early-onset preeclampsia.

Journal of Gynecology Research Reviews & Reports
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.