A Multi‐Probe Automated Classification of Ice Crystal Habits During the IMPACTS Campaign

Abstract Although all ice crystals are unique, many can be grouped together by shape or habit, with members of a habit class sharing similar representations of properties such as fall velocity and growth rate. A decision tree algorithm designed to be adaptable to any particle imaging probe, thus enabling the creation of habit size distributions over a size range larger than that of any probe on its own, is used to classify ice crystals imaged by three airborne cloud probes in mid‐latitude winter cyclones during the Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast‐Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) field campaign. Crystals are sorted into seven habit classes based on their morphological properties: sphere, column/needle, plate, graupel, dendrite, aggregate, and irregular. Although adaptability was its primary goal, the algorithm was found to be moderately skillful for identifying idealized habit images. Quantitative tests of the algorithm's adaptability displayed mixed results, as Two‐Dimensional Stereo Probe (2DS) classifications showed moderate correlation with Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering Probe (PHIPS) classifications, but only weak correlation with High Volume Precipitation Spectrometer (HVPS) classifications. The algorithm was applied to random sets of images from each probe in a case study of a mesoscale snow band sampled on 7 February 2020. In the case study, qualitative analysis of particle images revealed general agreement on classifications among the probes, supporting the algorithm's applicability to multiple cloud probes. Most classifications appeared correct upon manual inspection, suggesting that in practical use, the algorithm is reasonably able to classify non‐idealized images.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jd040895
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Icing and De-icing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi‐Probe Automated Classification of Ice Crystal Habits During the IMPACTS Campaign

Andrew J. Heymsfield, Joseph A. Finlon, Emma Järvinen, David J. Delene et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Icing and De-icing Technologies
1.30
article

A Multi‐Probe Automated Classification of Ice Crystal Habits During the IMPACTS Campaign

Andrew J. Heymsfield, Joseph A. Finlon, Emma Järvinen, David J. Delene, Julian Schima, Greg M. McFarquhar, Martin Schnaiter, Franziska Nehlert, Aaron Bansemer
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Although all ice crystals are unique, many can be grouped together by shape or habit, with members of a habit class sharing similar representations of properties such as fall velocity and growth rate. A decision tree algorithm designed to be adaptable to any particle imaging probe, thus enabling the creation of habit size distributions over a size range larger than that of any probe on its own, is used to classify ice crystals imaged by three airborne cloud probes in mid‐latitude winter cyclones during the Investigation of Microphysics and Precipitation for Atlantic Coast‐Threatening Snowstorms (IMPACTS) field campaign. Crystals are sorted into seven habit classes based on their morphological properties: sphere, column/needle, plate, graupel, dendrite, aggregate, and irregular. Although adaptability was its primary goal, the algorithm was found to be moderately skillful for identifying idealized habit images. Quantitative tests of the algorithm's adaptability displayed mixed results, as Two‐Dimensional Stereo Probe (2DS) classifications showed moderate correlation with Particle Habit Imaging and Polar Scattering Probe (PHIPS) classifications, but only weak correlation with High Volume Precipitation Spectrometer (HVPS) classifications. The algorithm was applied to random sets of images from each probe in a case study of a mesoscale snow band sampled on 7 February 2020. In the case study, qualitative analysis of particle images revealed general agreement on classifications among the probes, supporting the algorithm's applicability to multiple cloud probes. Most classifications appeared correct upon manual inspection, suggesting that in practical use, the algorithm is reasonably able to classify non‐idealized images.

Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresVol. 129(22)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological Studies (US), University of North Dakota (US), Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, University of Oklahoma, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Supercomputing Center for Education and Research, University of Oklahoma
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Icing and De-icing Technologies
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.