The Racial Policies of De-development in the Middle East

This paper examines the relationship of sovereignty with development and national identity in the violently hierarchized multinational, multireligious, and multilingual Iran. Drawing on the scholarship on Palestine studies and particularly Sara Roy’s theory of “de-development,” in this paper, we study how the sovereign ethnonation in Iran instrumentalizes and distorts development to subjugate the minoritized Kurdish nation. Along with contextualizing de-development theory within the broader discipline of developmental studies and elucidating the operatives of de-development, we compare the politicoeconomic circumstances of Rojhelat (eastern Kurdistan/Iran) with that of Palestine to underline the key similarities and differences between these two cases. Our research will illustrate the shortcomings of developmental studies in explaining the ethnoracial and religious undercurrents of economic disparity and reveal the noneconomic objectives of economic exploitation in the Middle East.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Anthropology
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733239
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Racial Policies of De-development in the Middle East

Kamal Soleimani, Ahmad Mohammadpour
3 citations
Current Anthropology
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
3.40
article

The Racial Policies of De-development in the Middle East

Kamal Soleimani, Ahmad Mohammadpour
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship of sovereignty with development and national identity in the violently hierarchized multinational, multireligious, and multilingual Iran. Drawing on the scholarship on Palestine studies and particularly Sara Roy’s theory of “de-development,” in this paper, we study how the sovereign ethnonation in Iran instrumentalizes and distorts development to subjugate the minoritized Kurdish nation. Along with contextualizing de-development theory within the broader discipline of developmental studies and elucidating the operatives of de-development, we compare the politicoeconomic circumstances of Rojhelat (eastern Kurdistan/Iran) with that of Palestine to underline the key similarities and differences between these two cases. Our research will illustrate the shortcomings of developmental studies in explaining the ethnoracial and religious undercurrents of economic disparity and reveal the noneconomic objectives of economic exploitation in the Middle East.

Current AnthropologyVol. 65(6)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.