Customs Penalties in the EU and Ukraine: Harmonizing the Unharmonized

This paper is an international law research on (1) the challenges of customs offenses harmonization in the EU, (2) an approximation of Ukraine’s (or other candidate country’s) legislation with the EU customs acquis. The research aims to (a) clarify the situation in the field of customs offenses, (b) analyse previous harmonization efforts, (c) find common denominators, and (d) synthesize the recommendations on how Ukraine shall act to harmonize with the EU customs acquis in the relevant field. At least two successful cases of harmonization are analysed, and conclusions are highlighted. A particular analysis is provided on the impossibility of abrupt alignment or using any EU country as a role model. The article offers an alternative – a gradual approximation by exchanging best practices. The research also emphasizes the importance of the procedural factors in the harmonization process. The article also defines additional possible sources of best practices such as (1) effectiveness, proportionality, and dissuasiveness through the prism of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) interpretations and (2) European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2025007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Customs Penalties in the EU and Ukraine: Harmonizing the Unharmonized

Oleg Kyryievskyi
1 citations
Global Trade and Customs Journal
European and International Law Studies
2.23
article

Customs Penalties in the EU and Ukraine: Harmonizing the Unharmonized

Oleg Kyryievskyi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper is an international law research on (1) the challenges of customs offenses harmonization in the EU, (2) an approximation of Ukraine’s (or other candidate country’s) legislation with the EU customs acquis. The research aims to (a) clarify the situation in the field of customs offenses, (b) analyse previous harmonization efforts, (c) find common denominators, and (d) synthesize the recommendations on how Ukraine shall act to harmonize with the EU customs acquis in the relevant field. At least two successful cases of harmonization are analysed, and conclusions are highlighted. A particular analysis is provided on the impossibility of abrupt alignment or using any EU country as a role model. The article offers an alternative – a gradual approximation by exchanging best practices. The research also emphasizes the importance of the procedural factors in the harmonization process. The article also defines additional possible sources of best practices such as (1) effectiveness, proportionality, and dissuasiveness through the prism of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) interpretations and (2) European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law.

Global Trade and Customs JournalVol. 20(Issue 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
European and International Law Studies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.