Oriental Chronology: Chinese Astronomy and the Politics of Antiquity in Eighteenth-Century Britain

This article argues that early modern European assessments of Chinese astronomy and, accordingly, antiquity were largely shaped by local concerns about conflicting schemes of political order. Exploring a little-studied controversy between the Anglican vicar and orientalist George Costard and the French Jesuit in Beijing Antoine Gaubil, the article examines the political stakes involved in promoting or rejecting Chinese astronomical chronology in Georgian Britain and Qing China, respectively. For Whig Anglicans, accepting Chinese astronomical chronology risked legitimizing the “despotic” political system that produced it. Conversely, for Jesuits in China, overtly rejecting Chinese astronomy and antiquity imperiled missionaries’ lives and the very survival of the mission. Eighteenth-century European political discourses thus both shaped and were subtly shaped by debates about Chinese astronomical practices and their relationship to antiquity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Isis
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733145
Citations
1
Primary Topic
History of Science and Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oriental Chronology: Chinese Astronomy and the Politics of Antiquity in Eighteenth-Century Britain

Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh
1 citations
Isis
History of Science and Medicine
6.04
article

Oriental Chronology: Chinese Astronomy and the Politics of Antiquity in Eighteenth-Century Britain

Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article argues that early modern European assessments of Chinese astronomy and, accordingly, antiquity were largely shaped by local concerns about conflicting schemes of political order. Exploring a little-studied controversy between the Anglican vicar and orientalist George Costard and the French Jesuit in Beijing Antoine Gaubil, the article examines the political stakes involved in promoting or rejecting Chinese astronomical chronology in Georgian Britain and Qing China, respectively. For Whig Anglicans, accepting Chinese astronomical chronology risked legitimizing the “despotic” political system that produced it. Conversely, for Jesuits in China, overtly rejecting Chinese astronomy and antiquity imperiled missionaries’ lives and the very survival of the mission. Eighteenth-century European political discourses thus both shaped and were subtly shaped by debates about Chinese astronomical practices and their relationship to antiquity.

IsisVol. 115(4)
University of Cambridge (GB), Northeast Catholic College (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
History of Science and Medicine
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Oriental Chronology: Chinese Astronomy and the Politics of Antiquity in Eighteenth-Century Britain — Gianamar Giovannetti-Singh · Isis (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS