Using the 5C Vaccine Hesitancy Framework to Elucidate and Measure Contraceptive Acceptability in sub-Saharan Africa

<h3>Key Messages</h3> There is a gap between goals of supporting reproductive agency and empowerment within family planning programs and measures able to track progress toward those goals. Commonly used family planning measures are beset by imprecise terminology and oversimplification and are often not person centered. Measuring contraceptive acceptability, which offers a means of understanding if and how contraceptive desire translates into contraceptive demand, requires a conceptual framework identifying the diverse factors that contribute to it. In assessing how the 5C framework of vaccine hesitancy (confidence, calculation, constraints, complacency, and collective responsibility) may inform our conceptualization of contraceptive acceptability in sub-Saharan Africa, we found that it has relevance, with confidence, calculation, and constraints appearing particularly salient. However, contraceptive acceptability is informed by additional social and gendered factors, including gender roles, gendered power dynamics, and social norms. This work represents a first step toward developing and testing a measure of contraceptive acceptability that can more precisely diagnose and support the achievement of self-determined reproductive goals and track progress toward those goals within family planning programs and at individual, community, and population levels.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Health Science and Practice
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9745/ghsp-d-24-00210
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the 5C Vaccine Hesitancy Framework to Elucidate and Measure Contraceptive Acceptability in sub-Saharan Africa

Lotus McDougal, Rebecka Lundgren, Caroline Deignan, Peter Kisaakye et al.
3 citations
Global Health Science and Practice
Global Maternal and Child Health
3.33
article

Using the 5C Vaccine Hesitancy Framework to Elucidate and Measure Contraceptive Acceptability in sub-Saharan Africa

Lotus McDougal, Rebecka Lundgren, Caroline Deignan, Peter Kisaakye, Madeleine Short Fabic, Shannon Pryor, Courtney McLarnon
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<h3>Key Messages</h3> There is a gap between goals of supporting reproductive agency and empowerment within family planning programs and measures able to track progress toward those goals. Commonly used family planning measures are beset by imprecise terminology and oversimplification and are often not person centered. Measuring contraceptive acceptability, which offers a means of understanding if and how contraceptive desire translates into contraceptive demand, requires a conceptual framework identifying the diverse factors that contribute to it. In assessing how the 5C framework of vaccine hesitancy (confidence, calculation, constraints, complacency, and collective responsibility) may inform our conceptualization of contraceptive acceptability in sub-Saharan Africa, we found that it has relevance, with confidence, calculation, and constraints appearing particularly salient. However, contraceptive acceptability is informed by additional social and gendered factors, including gender roles, gendered power dynamics, and social norms. This work represents a first step toward developing and testing a measure of contraceptive acceptability that can more precisely diagnose and support the achievement of self-determined reproductive goals and track progress toward those goals within family planning programs and at individual, community, and population levels.

Global Health Science and PracticeVol. 12(6)
Save the Children (US), UC San Diego Health System (US), United States Agency for International Development (US), University of California San Diego (US), Tygerberg Children’s Hospital (ZA), Center for Health and Gender Equity (US), Makerere University (UG)
United States Agency for International Development, University of California, San Diego
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Maternal and Child Health
3.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.