Differences in ongoing thought between autistic and non-autistic adults

Autistic people may be distinguishable from non-autistic individuals in the content and modality of their thoughts. Such differences potentially underlie both psychological vulnerability and strengths, motivating the need to better understand autistic thought patterns. In non-clinical undergraduates, a recent study found that autistic traits were associated with thinking more in words than images. However, it is unclear whether such differences in thought are present in clinically diagnosed autistic individuals. The current study applied the same methods (multidimensional experience sampling during an N-back task) to examine ongoing thought in autistic and non-autistic adults. We found that autistic individuals showed less variability in the modality of their thoughts between easy and difficult task contexts. While both non-autistic and autistic participants tended to report thinking more in words during the difficult task context, the difference between conditions was significantly smaller for the autistic group. In addition, autistic individuals showed a weaker coupling between task performance and off-task social thinking, a finding that may be related to differences in social processing during the off-task state. Overall, our results provide a clinical replication and extension of previous work, highlighting the differential effects of changing external context on internal mental states in autism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78286-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in ongoing thought between autistic and non-autistic adults

Adam G. Turnbull, Hugo Critchley, Brontë Mckeown, James Mulcahy et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Mind wandering and attention
0.34
article

Differences in ongoing thought between autistic and non-autistic adults

Adam G. Turnbull, Hugo Critchley, Brontë Mckeown, James Mulcahy, Hao-Ting Wang, Lisa Quadt, Sarah N. Garfinkel, Jonathan Smallwood, Will Strawson, Christina N Kampoureli, Marta Silva, Dennis E. O. Larrson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Autistic people may be distinguishable from non-autistic individuals in the content and modality of their thoughts. Such differences potentially underlie both psychological vulnerability and strengths, motivating the need to better understand autistic thought patterns. In non-clinical undergraduates, a recent study found that autistic traits were associated with thinking more in words than images. However, it is unclear whether such differences in thought are present in clinically diagnosed autistic individuals. The current study applied the same methods (multidimensional experience sampling during an N-back task) to examine ongoing thought in autistic and non-autistic adults. We found that autistic individuals showed less variability in the modality of their thoughts between easy and difficult task contexts. While both non-autistic and autistic participants tended to report thinking more in words during the difficult task context, the difference between conditions was significantly smaller for the autistic group. In addition, autistic individuals showed a weaker coupling between task performance and off-task social thinking, a finding that may be related to differences in social processing during the off-task state. Overall, our results provide a clinical replication and extension of previous work, highlighting the differential effects of changing external context on internal mental states in autism.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), University of Sussex (GB), Queen's University (CA), University College London (GB), University of Rochester (US), Université de Montréal (CA), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Mind wandering and attention
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.