Impact of a Restrictive Formulary on glycemic control compared with an Open Formulary

Abstract Introduction In 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom introduced executive order N‐01‐19, which transitioned California's Medicaid (Medi‐Cal) health plan pharmacy benefits from multiple managed care plans to a single‐payer system. This transition occurred on January 1, 2022, and Medi‐Cal stopped enforcing formulary restrictions for beneficiaries. Objectives This study compared glycemic control of hemoglobin A1c in a pharmacist‐led diabetes clinic during an open versus restrictive formulary. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of Medi‐Cal patients seen in a pharmacist‐led diabetes clinic at Kern Medical in Bakersfield, California between January 2021 and September 2022. All new patients with type 2 diabetes and an A1c greater than 6.9% seen at the clinic between January and September 2021 were classified as the Restrictive Formulary group and those seen between January and September 2022 were the Open Formulary group. The primary end point was mean change in A1c at first follow‐up. Secondary end points included attainment of an A1c <7%, change in weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, and statin use, and change in estimated monthly drug expenditure for glucose‐lowering medications per patient. Safety end points included diabetes‐related visits to Kern Medical's emergency room and hospitalizations. Results While both the Restrictive and Open Formulary groups had significant reductions in mean A1c from a baseline of −0.74 ± 2.1 ( p = 0.02) and − 2.7 ± 2.4 ( p < 0.001), respectively, the magnitude of A1c reduction was greater in the Open group ( p < 0.001). For secondary outcomes, the Open group saw a higher utilization of agents with known cardiovascular and renal benefits. The Open group had a modest weight reduction (−2.5 kg ± 4.4 kg, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the cost of diabetes therapy between the two groups ( p = 0.12). Conclusions An open formulary resulted in better glycemic control without significantly increasing the average monthly cost of diabetes medications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jac5.2048
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of a Restrictive Formulary on glycemic control compared with an Open Formulary

David Benjamin Lash, R. C. Aguirre, Jeffrey C. Jolliff, Aaron DuVall et al.
JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Impact of a Restrictive Formulary on glycemic control compared with an Open Formulary

David Benjamin Lash, R. C. Aguirre, Jeffrey C. Jolliff, Aaron DuVall, Trinh Tuan Duong
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction In 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom introduced executive order N‐01‐19, which transitioned California's Medicaid (Medi‐Cal) health plan pharmacy benefits from multiple managed care plans to a single‐payer system. This transition occurred on January 1, 2022, and Medi‐Cal stopped enforcing formulary restrictions for beneficiaries. Objectives This study compared glycemic control of hemoglobin A1c in a pharmacist‐led diabetes clinic during an open versus restrictive formulary. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of Medi‐Cal patients seen in a pharmacist‐led diabetes clinic at Kern Medical in Bakersfield, California between January 2021 and September 2022. All new patients with type 2 diabetes and an A1c greater than 6.9% seen at the clinic between January and September 2021 were classified as the Restrictive Formulary group and those seen between January and September 2022 were the Open Formulary group. The primary end point was mean change in A1c at first follow‐up. Secondary end points included attainment of an A1c <7%, change in weight, blood pressure, cholesterol, and statin use, and change in estimated monthly drug expenditure for glucose‐lowering medications per patient. Safety end points included diabetes‐related visits to Kern Medical's emergency room and hospitalizations. Results While both the Restrictive and Open Formulary groups had significant reductions in mean A1c from a baseline of −0.74 ± 2.1 ( p = 0.02) and − 2.7 ± 2.4 ( p < 0.001), respectively, the magnitude of A1c reduction was greater in the Open group ( p < 0.001). For secondary outcomes, the Open group saw a higher utilization of agents with known cardiovascular and renal benefits. The Open group had a modest weight reduction (−2.5 kg ± 4.4 kg, p = 0.027). There was no significant difference in the cost of diabetes therapy between the two groups ( p = 0.12). Conclusions An open formulary resulted in better glycemic control without significantly increasing the average monthly cost of diabetes medications.

JACCP JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACYVol. 7(12)
Kern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.