A machine learning approach to stratify patients with hypermobile Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders according to disorders of gut brain interaction, comorbidities and quality of life

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) exist in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). However, it is unknown if clusters of hEDS/HSD patients exist which overlap with different DGBIs and whether this overlap influences presence of comorbidities and quality of life. We aimed to study these knowledge gaps. METHODS: A prospectively collected hEDS/HSD cohort of 1044 individuals were studied. We undertook Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection-enabled (UMAP) dimension reduction to create a representation of nonlinear interactions between hEDS/HSD and DGBIs, from which individuals were stratified into clusters. Somatization, Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS), autonomic symptoms, psychological factors and quality of life were statistically compared between clusters. KEY RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 40 ± 13.2 years; 87.8% were female. Patients segregated into three clusters: Cluster 0 (n = 466): hEDS/HSD+ functional foregut disorders (FFD) + irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); Cluster 1 (n = 180): hEDS/HSD+ IBS and Cluster 2 (n = 337): hEDS/HSD alone. In cluster 0, we demonstrated increased somatization (p <0.0001), anxiety (p <0.0001), depression (p <0.0001), PoTS prevalence (p = 0.003), autonomic symptoms (p <0.0001) and reduced quality of life (p <0.0001) compared to cluster 2. Cluster 0 had greater comorbidity burden than cluster 1. CONCLUSIONS: Within hEDS/HSD, subgroups exist with a high prevalence of FFD and IBS. These subgroups have a higher prevalence of psychological disorders, dysautonomia and poorer quality of life compared with hEDS/HSD alone. Further research should focus on healthcare utilization, management and prognosis in hEDS/HSD and DGBI overlap.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/na38-nw11
Primary Topic
Connective tissue disorders research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A machine learning approach to stratify patients with hypermobile Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders according to disorders of gut brain interaction, comorbidities and quality of life

Kazuya Takahashi, Olafur S. Palsson, Qasim Aziz, James K. Ruffle et al.
UNC Libraries
Connective tissue disorders research
article

A machine learning approach to stratify patients with hypermobile Ehlers‐Danlos syndrome/hypermobility spectrum disorders according to disorders of gut brain interaction, comorbidities and quality of life

Kazuya Takahashi, Olafur S. Palsson, Qasim Aziz, James K. Ruffle, Imran Aziz, Anisa Choudhary, Asma Fikree
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A high prevalence of disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) exist in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hEDS) and hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). However, it is unknown if clusters of hEDS/HSD patients exist which overlap with different DGBIs and whether this overlap influences presence of comorbidities and quality of life. We aimed to study these knowledge gaps. METHODS: A prospectively collected hEDS/HSD cohort of 1044 individuals were studied. We undertook Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection-enabled (UMAP) dimension reduction to create a representation of nonlinear interactions between hEDS/HSD and DGBIs, from which individuals were stratified into clusters. Somatization, Postural Tachycardia Syndrome (PoTS), autonomic symptoms, psychological factors and quality of life were statistically compared between clusters. KEY RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 40 ± 13.2 years; 87.8% were female. Patients segregated into three clusters: Cluster 0 (n = 466): hEDS/HSD+ functional foregut disorders (FFD) + irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); Cluster 1 (n = 180): hEDS/HSD+ IBS and Cluster 2 (n = 337): hEDS/HSD alone. In cluster 0, we demonstrated increased somatization (p <0.0001), anxiety (p <0.0001), depression (p <0.0001), PoTS prevalence (p = 0.003), autonomic symptoms (p <0.0001) and reduced quality of life (p <0.0001) compared to cluster 2. Cluster 0 had greater comorbidity burden than cluster 1. CONCLUSIONS: Within hEDS/HSD, subgroups exist with a high prevalence of FFD and IBS. These subgroups have a higher prevalence of psychological disorders, dysautonomia and poorer quality of life compared with hEDS/HSD alone. Further research should focus on healthcare utilization, management and prognosis in hEDS/HSD and DGBI overlap.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Connective tissue disorders research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.