A Survey of Algorithmic Methods for Competency Self-Assessments in Human-Autonomy Teaming

Humans working with autonomous artificially intelligent systems may not be experts in the inner workings of their machine teammates, but need to understand when to employ, trust, and rely on the system. A critical challenge is to develop machine agents with the capacity to understand their own capabilities and limitations, and the ability to communicate this information to human partners. Self-assessment is an emerging field that tackles this challenge through the development of algorithms that enable autonomous agents to understand and communicate their competency. These methods can engender appropriate trust and align human expectations with autonomous assistant abilities. However, current research in self-assessment is dispersed across many fields, including artificial intelligence, robotics, and human factors. This survey connects work from these disparate areas and reviews state-of-the-art methods for algorithmic self-assessments that enable autonomous agents to estimate, understand, and communicate valuable information pertaining to their competency, with focus on methods that can improve interactions within human-machine teams. To better understand the landscape of self-assessment approaches, we present a framework for categorizing work in self-assessment based on underlying algorithm type: test-based , learning-based , or knowledge-based . We synthesize common features across these approaches and discuss relevant future directions for research in this emerging space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/0y51-mw87
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Survey of Algorithmic Methods for Competency Self-Assessments in Human-Autonomy Teaming

Daniel Szafır, Nicholas Conlon, Nisar Ahmed
1 citations
UNC Libraries
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
0.64
article

A Survey of Algorithmic Methods for Competency Self-Assessments in Human-Autonomy Teaming

Daniel Szafır, Nicholas Conlon, Nisar Ahmed
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Humans working with autonomous artificially intelligent systems may not be experts in the inner workings of their machine teammates, but need to understand when to employ, trust, and rely on the system. A critical challenge is to develop machine agents with the capacity to understand their own capabilities and limitations, and the ability to communicate this information to human partners. Self-assessment is an emerging field that tackles this challenge through the development of algorithms that enable autonomous agents to understand and communicate their competency. These methods can engender appropriate trust and align human expectations with autonomous assistant abilities. However, current research in self-assessment is dispersed across many fields, including artificial intelligence, robotics, and human factors. This survey connects work from these disparate areas and reviews state-of-the-art methods for algorithmic self-assessments that enable autonomous agents to estimate, understand, and communicate valuable information pertaining to their competency, with focus on methods that can improve interactions within human-machine teams. To better understand the landscape of self-assessment approaches, we present a framework for categorizing work in self-assessment based on underlying algorithm type: test-based , learning-based , or knowledge-based . We synthesize common features across these approaches and discuss relevant future directions for research in this emerging space.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Advanced Research Projects Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Survey of Algorithmic Methods for Competency Self-Assessments in Human-Autonomy Teaming — Daniel Szafır, Nicholas Conlon, et al. · UNC Libraries (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS