Association between cancer risk assessment tool use and GP consultation duration: an observational study
There was no evidence to suggest that eRATs should not be used to support GPs in early cancer diagnosis from a workload perspective. Activation of eRATs was not associated with increased workload across a consulting session, despite a small increase in time observed in individual consultations involving eRATs. Ultimately, therefore, it should be definitive findings regarding the clinical effectiveness of eRATs, not the related workload/workflow implications, that determine whether the use of eRATs should be rolled out more widely.
Authors
- Luke Mounce (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-0661)
- Emily Fletcher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1319-3051)
- Gary Abel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2231-5161)
- Emma Pitchforth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-9331)
- John Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6752-3493)
- William Hamilton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-1373)
Institutions
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Center for Global Health (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2024-11-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2024.0135
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.13