Diagnostic Efficacy of Combined CT Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy Versus Either Technique Alone in Peripheral Lung Lesions

Background: Precise cytological and histological diagnosis is crucial in the era of targeted therapy for lung lesions. Both Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and Core Needle Biopsy (CNB) are established diagnostic techniques, yet their individual and combined efficacy remains debated. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of combined CT-guided FNAC and CNB versus either technique alone in peripheral lung lesions. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 110 patients with undiagnosed peripheral lung lesions at the National Institute of Diseases of Chest and Hospital (NIDCH) during 2023. CT-guided FNAC was performed using a 22-gauge spinal needle, followed by CNB using an 18-gauge Trucut needle in the same setting. Six FNAC smears were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, while CNB specimens were processed as paraffin-embedded blocks. Results were classified into four categories: inadequate, negative, suspicious, and positive for malignancy. Results: The diagnostic yield of the combined approach was 99.1%, compared to 89.1% for FNAC alone and 98.2% for CNB alone. FNAC showed 85.1% sensitivity while CNB demonstrated 97.7% sensitivity. Both methods achieved 100% specificity and positive predictive value. The negative predictive value was 77.3% for FNAC versus 95.7% for CNB. Among malignant lesions (n=87), CNB provided definitive diagnosis in cases where FNAC showed suspicious findings (10 cases). For benign lesions (n=22), CNB showed superior diagnostic capability, particularly in granulomatous inflammation and chronic pneumonitis. Procedure-related complications were minimal (3.6%) with no major adverse events. Conclusion: Combined FNAC and CNB approach provides superior diagnostic yield compared to either technique alone. While CNB demonstrated higher individual diagnostic accuracy, the combined approach offered maximum diagnostic precision without significantly increasing complications. This strategy is particularly valuable for cases ...

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences
Published
2024-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2024.v12i11.026
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Efficacy of Combined CT Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy Versus Either Technique Alone in Peripheral Lung Lesions

Rizwana Sharmin, Abir Hasan Dip, Abdullah Al Masud, Shafiul Azam Quadry
Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Diagnostic Efficacy of Combined CT Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy Versus Either Technique Alone in Peripheral Lung Lesions

Rizwana Sharmin, Abir Hasan Dip, Abdullah Al Masud, Shafiul Azam Quadry
article en

Abstract

Background: Precise cytological and histological diagnosis is crucial in the era of targeted therapy for lung lesions. Both Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and Core Needle Biopsy (CNB) are established diagnostic techniques, yet their individual and combined efficacy remains debated. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of combined CT-guided FNAC and CNB versus either technique alone in peripheral lung lesions. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 110 patients with undiagnosed peripheral lung lesions at the National Institute of Diseases of Chest and Hospital (NIDCH) during 2023. CT-guided FNAC was performed using a 22-gauge spinal needle, followed by CNB using an 18-gauge Trucut needle in the same setting. Six FNAC smears were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, while CNB specimens were processed as paraffin-embedded blocks. Results were classified into four categories: inadequate, negative, suspicious, and positive for malignancy. Results: The diagnostic yield of the combined approach was 99.1%, compared to 89.1% for FNAC alone and 98.2% for CNB alone. FNAC showed 85.1% sensitivity while CNB demonstrated 97.7% sensitivity. Both methods achieved 100% specificity and positive predictive value. The negative predictive value was 77.3% for FNAC versus 95.7% for CNB. Among malignant lesions (n=87), CNB provided definitive diagnosis in cases where FNAC showed suspicious findings (10 cases). For benign lesions (n=22), CNB showed superior diagnostic capability, particularly in granulomatous inflammation and chronic pneumonitis. Procedure-related complications were minimal (3.6%) with no major adverse events. Conclusion: Combined FNAC and CNB approach provides superior diagnostic yield compared to either technique alone. While CNB demonstrated higher individual diagnostic accuracy, the combined approach offered maximum diagnostic precision without significantly increasing complications. This strategy is particularly valuable for cases ...

Scholars Journal of Applied Medical SciencesVol. 12(11)
BRAC (BD), National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases (BD), Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College (BD), Medical College For Women and Hospital, Dhaka Medical College and Hospital (BD)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.