The Norman Conquest in English History, Volume I: A Broken Chain?, by George Garnett

This book is the first volume of a study on the history of the Norman Conquest in English history. Together, Volumes One and Two will consider how historical interpretations of the Conquest were constructed and used from the late eleventh to the late seventeenth centuries. The first book—the subject of this review—covers the majority of this period, from c.1190 to the point in the seventeenth century at which, George Garnett explains, ‘the bulk of what were then recognised as the most important sources on the Conquest and what had preceded it had become widely available in print’ (p. 2). The forthcoming second volume, yet to be published at the time of writing, will investigate how these materials were used from the later years of Elizabeth I’s reign to the end of the seventeenth century, ‘when the Conquest rapidly became an even more contested issue than it had been in the twelfth’ (p. 2).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The English Historical Review
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ceae223
Primary Topic
Medieval Literature and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Norman Conquest in English History, Volume I: A Broken Chain?, by George Garnett

William Eves
The English Historical Review
Medieval Literature and History
article

The Norman Conquest in English History, Volume I: A Broken Chain?, by George Garnett

William Eves
article en

Abstract

This book is the first volume of a study on the history of the Norman Conquest in English history. Together, Volumes One and Two will consider how historical interpretations of the Conquest were constructed and used from the late eleventh to the late seventeenth centuries. The first book—the subject of this review—covers the majority of this period, from c.1190 to the point in the seventeenth century at which, George Garnett explains, ‘the bulk of what were then recognised as the most important sources on the Conquest and what had preceded it had become widely available in print’ (p. 2). The forthcoming second volume, yet to be published at the time of writing, will investigate how these materials were used from the later years of Elizabeth I’s reign to the end of the seventeenth century, ‘when the Conquest rapidly became an even more contested issue than it had been in the twelfth’ (p. 2).

The English Historical ReviewVol. 139(601)
University of Nottingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Medieval Literature and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.