Validation of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS) Among Health and Social Care Workers in the UK

Psychological safety is essential for rest, recovery, and fostering social connections, particularly for health and social care workers (HSCWs) who frequently operate in high-pressure environments. These workers are prone to traumatic stress, which can elevate their sense of threat and undermine their psychological safety. This study aimed to validate the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS) among HSCWs in the UK (<i>n</i> = 443). The NPSS is based on polyvagal theory and assesses the dimensions of compassion, social engagement and bodily sensations. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity were examined, along with the scale's dimensionality. A three-factor structure was confirmed, with internal consistencies ranging from acceptable to excellent across subscales. Validity was supported by significant associations with measures of team psychological safety, well-being, post-traumatic stress, burnout, body perception, and personality. The NPSS also demonstrated strong test-retest reliability. These results validate the NPSS as a reliable and multidimensional tool for assessing psychological safety in health and social care settings. The study highlights the importance of psychological safety for HSCWs and provides a valuable measure to support interventions aimed at fostering safer and more supportive work environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21121551
Citations
43
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS) Among Health and Social Care Workers in the UK

Stephen W. Porges, Liza Morton, David Young, Nicola Ann Cogan et al.
43 citations
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
36.52
article

Validation of the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS) Among Health and Social Care Workers in the UK

Stephen W. Porges, Liza Morton, David Young, Nicola Ann Cogan, John Campbell
article en
43 citations

Abstract

Psychological safety is essential for rest, recovery, and fostering social connections, particularly for health and social care workers (HSCWs) who frequently operate in high-pressure environments. These workers are prone to traumatic stress, which can elevate their sense of threat and undermine their psychological safety. This study aimed to validate the Neuroception of Psychological Safety Scale (NPSS) among HSCWs in the UK (<i>n</i> = 443). The NPSS is based on polyvagal theory and assesses the dimensions of compassion, social engagement and bodily sensations. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity were examined, along with the scale's dimensionality. A three-factor structure was confirmed, with internal consistencies ranging from acceptable to excellent across subscales. Validity was supported by significant associations with measures of team psychological safety, well-being, post-traumatic stress, burnout, body perception, and personality. The NPSS also demonstrated strong test-retest reliability. These results validate the NPSS as a reliable and multidimensional tool for assessing psychological safety in health and social care settings. The study highlights the importance of psychological safety for HSCWs and provides a valuable measure to support interventions aimed at fostering safer and more supportive work environments.

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthVol. 21(12)
University of Strathclyde (GB), Glasgow Caledonian University (GB), Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
36.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.