Development of practical tools to realize the epistemic responsibilities of universities: a co-design study

University rankings have strongly influenced the values, practices, and policies universities adopt to be considered good universities. Thinking in terms of epistemic responsibilities (ERs) of universities provides a novel framework that could counter the traditional use of rankings and its negative effects, by accentuating other and broader responsibilities for research, teaching, and in service to society. We conducted a co-design study to develop practical tools to foster ERs. Applied co-design methodology is characterized by creativity, collaboration, and democratic knowledge formation. In an iterative co-design process with 25 participants from a range of backgrounds, we co-designed three policy tools for fostering ERs at universities: (1) organization of events and activities about the ERs to create awareness about them, (2) establishment of red teams to critically reflect on ERs and (3) setting up co-creation spaces in which stakeholders prioritize and develop university actions to foster ERs. In this study, we showed how policy for higher education can be developed using co-design methodology. Lastly, these three co-designed tools focus on realizing ERs through collaborative bottom-up processes, while also valuing the particular contexts of universities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy Reviews in Higher Education
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2024.2431744
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of practical tools to realize the epistemic responsibilities of universities: a co-design study

Jeroen de Ridder, Emma Nyhof Ajdari, L.M. Bouter, Iris M. Lechner et al.
1 citations
Policy Reviews in Higher Education
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
2.10
article

Development of practical tools to realize the epistemic responsibilities of universities: a co-design study

Jeroen de Ridder, Emma Nyhof Ajdari, L.M. Bouter, Iris M. Lechner, R. van Woudenberg, Joeri K. Tijdink
article en
1 citations

Abstract

University rankings have strongly influenced the values, practices, and policies universities adopt to be considered good universities. Thinking in terms of epistemic responsibilities (ERs) of universities provides a novel framework that could counter the traditional use of rankings and its negative effects, by accentuating other and broader responsibilities for research, teaching, and in service to society. We conducted a co-design study to develop practical tools to foster ERs. Applied co-design methodology is characterized by creativity, collaboration, and democratic knowledge formation. In an iterative co-design process with 25 participants from a range of backgrounds, we co-designed three policy tools for fostering ERs at universities: (1) organization of events and activities about the ERs to create awareness about them, (2) establishment of red teams to critically reflect on ERs and (3) setting up co-creation spaces in which stakeholders prioritize and develop university actions to foster ERs. In this study, we showed how policy for higher education can be developed using co-design methodology. Lastly, these three co-designed tools focus on realizing ERs through collaborative bottom-up processes, while also valuing the particular contexts of universities.

Policy Reviews in Higher EducationVol. 9(1)
Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Templeton World Charity Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Higher Education Practises and Engagement
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development of practical tools to realize the epistemic responsibilities of universities: a co-design study — Jeroen de Ridder, Emma Nyhof Ajdari, et al. · Policy Reviews in Higher Education (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS