Slow-Release Pharmaceutical Implants in Ecotoxicology: Validating Functionality across Exposure Scenarios

Pharmaceutical contaminants have spread in natural environments across the globe, endangering biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and public health. Research on the environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals is growing rapidly, although a majority of studies are still conducted under controlled laboratory conditions. As such, there is an urgent need to understand the impacts of pharmaceutical exposures on wildlife in complex, real-world scenarios. Here, we validate the performance of slow-release pharmaceutical implants-a recently developed tool in field-based ecotoxicology that allows for the controlled chemical dosing of free-roaming aquatic species-in terms of the accumulation and distribution of pharmaceuticals of interest in tissues. Across two years, we directly exposed 256 Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) smolts to one of four pharmaceutical treatments: clobazam (50 μg g<sup>-1</sup> of implant), tramadol (50 μg g<sup>-1</sup>), clobazam and tramadol (50 μg g<sup>-1</sup> of each), and control (0 μg g<sup>-1</sup>). Fish dosed with slow-release implants containing clobazam or tramadol, or their mixture, accumulated these pharmaceuticals in all of the sampled tissues: brain, liver, and muscle. Concentrations of both pharmaceuticals peaked in all tissues at 1 day post-implantation, before reaching relatively stable, slowly declining concentrations for the remainder of the 30-day sampling period. Generally, the highest concentrations of clobazam and tramadol were detected in the liver, followed by the brain and then muscle, with observed concentrations of each pharmaceutical being higher in the single-exposure treatments relative to the mixture exposure. Taken together, our findings underscore the utility of slow-release implants as a tool in field-based ecotoxicology, which is an urgent research priority given the current lack of knowledge on the real-world impacts of pharmaceuticals on wildlife.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Environmental Au
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.4c00056
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Slow-Release Pharmaceutical Implants in Ecotoxicology: Validating Functionality across Exposure Scenarios

Jerker Fick, Marcus Michelangeli, Jake M. Martin, Jack A. Brand et al.
4 citations
ACS Environmental Au
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
0.53
article

Slow-Release Pharmaceutical Implants in Ecotoxicology: Validating Functionality across Exposure Scenarios

Jerker Fick, Marcus Michelangeli, Jake M. Martin, Jack A. Brand, Erin S. McCallum, Daniel Červený, Tomas Brodin, Michael G. Bertram, Eli S.J. Thoré
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Pharmaceutical contaminants have spread in natural environments across the globe, endangering biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and public health. Research on the environmental impacts of pharmaceuticals is growing rapidly, although a majority of studies are still conducted under controlled laboratory conditions. As such, there is an urgent need to understand the impacts of pharmaceutical exposures on wildlife in complex, real-world scenarios. Here, we validate the performance of slow-release pharmaceutical implants-a recently developed tool in field-based ecotoxicology that allows for the controlled chemical dosing of free-roaming aquatic species-in terms of the accumulation and distribution of pharmaceuticals of interest in tissues. Across two years, we directly exposed 256 Atlantic salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>) smolts to one of four pharmaceutical treatments: clobazam (50 μg g<sup>-1</sup> of implant), tramadol (50 μg g<sup>-1</sup>), clobazam and tramadol (50 μg g<sup>-1</sup> of each), and control (0 μg g<sup>-1</sup>). Fish dosed with slow-release implants containing clobazam or tramadol, or their mixture, accumulated these pharmaceuticals in all of the sampled tissues: brain, liver, and muscle. Concentrations of both pharmaceuticals peaked in all tissues at 1 day post-implantation, before reaching relatively stable, slowly declining concentrations for the remainder of the 30-day sampling period. Generally, the highest concentrations of clobazam and tramadol were detected in the liver, followed by the brain and then muscle, with observed concentrations of each pharmaceutical being higher in the single-exposure treatments relative to the mixture exposure. Taken together, our findings underscore the utility of slow-release implants as a tool in field-based ecotoxicology, which is an urgent research priority given the current lack of knowledge on the real-world impacts of pharmaceuticals on wildlife.

ACS Environmental AuVol. 5(1)
Griffith University (AU), Zoological Society of London (GB), Deakin University (AU), University of Namur (BE), Stockholm University (SE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ), Monash University (AU), Umeå University (SE), KU Leuven (BE)
Stiftelsen Oscar och Lili Lamms Minne, Marie-Claire Cronstedts Stiftelse, Kempe Foundation, European Commission, Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Vetenskapsrådet, Kempestiftelserna, Stiftelsen Åforsk, H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.