Comparison of a Fully Angiography‐Derived Versus a Hybrid of Angiography and Pressure‐Wire‐Derived Approach to Assess Coronary Microvascular Resistance: The Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction Hybrid (OxAMI‐HYBRID) Study
Both approaches, IMR<sub>hybrid</sub> and IMR<sub>angio</sub> are viable and comparable indices correlating with bolus thermodilution-based IMR and retaining good diagnostic accuracy. IMR<sub>hybrid</sub> specifically is a simple alternative to conventional bolus thermodilution-based IMR applicable to any pressure wire system.
Authors
- Keith M. Channon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1043-4342)
- Liam S. Couch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9926-2574)
- Federico Marin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8776-6647)
- Jason Chai (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7398-9564)
- Roberto Scarsini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5916-8882)
- Giovanni Luigi De Maria (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-1855)
- Jeremy P. Langrish
- Rafail A. Kotronias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8132-6130)
- ADRIAN P BANNING (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2842-7861)
- Stefano Benenati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9669-4278)
- Miao Chu
Institutions
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- University of Genoa (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2024-11-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.31311
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- British Heart Foundation
- BHF Centre of Research Excellence, Oxford