How to account for spatial trade-offs in planning for urban climate adaptation? Optimizing green and grey infrastructures

Urban Nature-Based Solutions have emerged as sound strategies for urban climate change adaptation, but they lack effective decision-support tools. This paper proposes a decision-support framework that relies on Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO), the consideration of actual space availability, the consideration of the simultaneous objectives of climate change adaptation and water management, the integration of demand for co-benefits, and the participatory exploration of trade-offs for decision-makers. The MOO is applied to the case study of the French city of Bordeaux, to identify the optimal location of Groundwater Recharge Infrastructures (GRI) that include Nature-Based Solutions. It provides decision-makers with spatially explicit solutions for developing GRI, with the objectives of maximizing groundwater recharge, maximizing urban cooling, while minimizing opportunity costs, in the context of urban climate change adaptation. Results indicate an array of solutions between two polar strategies: large scale specialized grey solutions in most effective recharge areas, or diffused Nature-Based Solutions to satisfy citizen demand for multiple benefits. The participatory trade-off analysis proposed in this paper is a novel way to co-design spatial climate change adaptation strategies in urban contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123380
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.11

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to account for spatial trade-offs in planning for urban climate adaptation? Optimizing green and grey infrastructures

Georges Farina, Cécile Hérivaux, Stéphanie Pinson, Philippe Le Coënt et al.
11 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
3.11
article

How to account for spatial trade-offs in planning for urban climate adaptation? Optimizing green and grey infrastructures

Georges Farina, Cécile Hérivaux, Stéphanie Pinson, Philippe Le Coënt, Jean-Christophe Péreau, Jérôme Barrière, Noémie Neverre, Hélène Habarou
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Urban Nature-Based Solutions have emerged as sound strategies for urban climate change adaptation, but they lack effective decision-support tools. This paper proposes a decision-support framework that relies on Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO), the consideration of actual space availability, the consideration of the simultaneous objectives of climate change adaptation and water management, the integration of demand for co-benefits, and the participatory exploration of trade-offs for decision-makers. The MOO is applied to the case study of the French city of Bordeaux, to identify the optimal location of Groundwater Recharge Infrastructures (GRI) that include Nature-Based Solutions. It provides decision-makers with spatially explicit solutions for developing GRI, with the objectives of maximizing groundwater recharge, maximizing urban cooling, while minimizing opportunity costs, in the context of urban climate change adaptation. Results indicate an array of solutions between two polar strategies: large scale specialized grey solutions in most effective recharge areas, or diffused Nature-Based Solutions to satisfy citizen demand for multiple benefits. The participatory trade-off analysis proposed in this paper is a novel way to co-design spatial climate change adaptation strategies in urban contexts.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 372
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), AgroParisTech (FR), Institut Agro Montpellier (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Gestion de l'Eau, Acteurs, Usages (FR), Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités Ange Guépin (FR), Veolia (France) (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Services déconcentrés d'appui à la recherche Occitanie-Montpellier (FR), Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Bordeaux Sciences Économiques (FR), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Agence de l'Eau Adour-Garonne, Université de Bordeaux, Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
3.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.