Experience with remote electronic portal imaging device-based dosimetric auditing for static and rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy

The aim of this work was to evaluate results of a remote electronic portal imaging based dosimetric auditing method using Task-Group 218 clinical gamma evaluation criteria (3%,2 mm, 10% dose threshold). For intensity modulated radiation therapy the results were (mean ± 1 SD) 97.9 ± 4.5% with 31/34 audits passing (optimal level, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math> 95%) and 3/34 audits failing (action level, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo><</mml:mo></mml:math> 90%). For volumetric modulated arc therapy the results were 98.5 ± 2.3% with 32/36 audits passing (optimal level) and 4/36 passing (tolerance level, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math> 90% and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo><</mml:mo></mml:math> 95%). The audit has been successfully applied globally for clinical trial quality assurance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100674
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience with remote electronic portal imaging device-based dosimetric auditing for static and rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy

Alisha Moore, Jöerg Lehmann, Peter B. Greer
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Experience with remote electronic portal imaging device-based dosimetric auditing for static and rotational intensity modulated radiotherapy

Alisha Moore, Jöerg Lehmann, Peter B. Greer
article en

Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate results of a remote electronic portal imaging based dosimetric auditing method using Task-Group 218 clinical gamma evaluation criteria (3%,2 mm, 10% dose threshold). For intensity modulated radiation therapy the results were (mean ± 1 SD) 97.9 ± 4.5% with 31/34 audits passing (optimal level, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math> 95%) and 3/34 audits failing (action level, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo><</mml:mo></mml:math> 90%). For volumetric modulated arc therapy the results were 98.5 ± 2.3% with 32/36 audits passing (optimal level) and 4/36 passing (tolerance level, <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math> 90% and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mo><</mml:mo></mml:math> 95%). The audit has been successfully applied globally for clinical trial quality assurance.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation OncologyVol. 32
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (AU), Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Calvary Mater Newcastle
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.