Patient‐reported visual function outcomes in immediately sequential versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery

Both ISBCS and DSBCS are effective options to treat bilateral cataracts with no statistically significant difference in patient-reported vision outcomes. However, we found postoperative satisfaction with the surgical approach to be higher among ISBCS patients, which suggests that ISBCS-related benefits, such as fewer health care visits and shorter vision rehabilitation, are compelling to patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Ophthalmologica
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.16785
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.77

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient‐reported visual function outcomes in immediately sequential versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery

Amardeep Singh, Mads Assenholt Nielsen, Esben Nielsen, Jakob Bjerager et al.
2 citations
Acta Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
0.77
article

Patient‐reported visual function outcomes in immediately sequential versus delayed sequential bilateral cataract surgery

Amardeep Singh, Mads Assenholt Nielsen, Esben Nielsen, Jakob Bjerager, Yousif Subhi, Gülsenay Citirak, Lars Morten Holm
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Both ISBCS and DSBCS are effective options to treat bilateral cataracts with no statistically significant difference in patient-reported vision outcomes. However, we found postoperative satisfaction with the surgical approach to be higher among ISBCS patients, which suggests that ISBCS-related benefits, such as fewer health care visits and shorter vision rehabilitation, are compelling to patients.

Acta OphthalmologicaVol. 103(3)
University of Copenhagen (DK), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus Municipality (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Velux Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
0.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.