Comparative evaluation of Artec Leo hand-held scanner and iPad Pro for 3D scanning of cervical and craniofacial data: assessing precision, accuracy, and user experience
The iPad Pro using the Qlone app demonstrates a viable alternative to the Artec Leo, particularly for capturing head and neck surface area within a clinical setting. The scanning resolution, with an error margin within ±5%, is consistent with clinically accepted standards for orthosis design, where padding and final fit adjustments allow for bespoke devices that accommodate patient comfort. This study highlights the comparative performance of the iPad, as well as suggests two methods which can be used within clinics to correct head drop for scanning.
Authors
- Thomas Lester (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4992-9417)
- Ryo Torii (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-8719)
- Samuel D J Spears (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6355-3997)
- Deepak M. Kalaskar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0576-1816)
Institutions
- Royal College of Physicians (GB)
- University College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- 3D Printing in Medicine
- Published
- 2024-11-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-024-00245-8
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.29
Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council