Peer assessment and individual contribution analysis for measuring collaborative problem solving capability

Abstract Accurately measuring collaborative problem-solving capability (CPSC) is not only important in itself, but also in order to develop education and training programs. However, most existing CPSC measurement tools have two weaknesses: not accounting for individual’s contribution to the final outcome and relying on predefined problems. Addressing these limitations, we extended criteria of the PISA 2015 framework to consider individual’s contribution to the final outcome, and introduced peer assessment. To test the validity of our proposition, we conducted a study with fifty-one participants, performing two tasks in different groups. We found a strong correlation between the existing CPSC score and our extended CPSC score. And extended CPSC scores from peers approximated extended CPSC scores from expert. Furthermore, extended CPSC scores from peers showed the consistency across different tasks and groups. These results suggest that our proposition can be used to measure CPSC while addressing two limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-07040-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peer assessment and individual contribution analysis for measuring collaborative problem solving capability

Min Hae Song, Jung Ae Park, Jooyong Park
3 citations
Current Psychology
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
2.37
article

Peer assessment and individual contribution analysis for measuring collaborative problem solving capability

Min Hae Song, Jung Ae Park, Jooyong Park
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Accurately measuring collaborative problem-solving capability (CPSC) is not only important in itself, but also in order to develop education and training programs. However, most existing CPSC measurement tools have two weaknesses: not accounting for individual’s contribution to the final outcome and relying on predefined problems. Addressing these limitations, we extended criteria of the PISA 2015 framework to consider individual’s contribution to the final outcome, and introduced peer assessment. To test the validity of our proposition, we conducted a study with fifty-one participants, performing two tasks in different groups. We found a strong correlation between the existing CPSC score and our extended CPSC score. And extended CPSC scores from peers approximated extended CPSC scores from expert. Furthermore, extended CPSC scores from peers showed the consistency across different tasks and groups. These results suggest that our proposition can be used to measure CPSC while addressing two limitations.

Current PsychologyVol. 43(46)
Seoul National University (KR)
Seoul National University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Peer assessment and individual contribution analysis for measuring collaborative problem solving capability — Min Hae Song, Jung Ae Park, et al. · Current Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS