Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis

Bone mineral density (BMD) is a crucial indicator of osteoporosis. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) introduces a new method for assessing body composition, specifically BMD measurement. Compared with existing ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for BMD screening and diagnosis, BIA has the advantages of safety, convenience and speed. However, the accuracy of BIA for BMD measurement needs to be explored. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the novel BIA technique in conducting whole-body BMD assessments in the general population of Taiwan. Overall, 318 healthy adults in Taiwan (37.67 ± 19.44 years of age; 145 male and 173 female patients) were included. Whole-body BMD was measured via foot-to-foot BIA-StarBIA-201 (StarBIA Meditek Co. LTD, Taichung, Taiwan) and the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Lunar Prodigy technology (GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Linear regression analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman plot, and paired t tests were used. The whole-body BMDs measured by BIA and DXA were 1.139 ± 0.124 g/cm<sup>2</sup> and 1.202 ± 0.168 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737, - 0.053 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737 (p < 0.001), - 0.053 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Standing BIA was correlated with the DXA gold standard for estimating whole-body BMD in adults; however, its interchangeability remains limited. The potential bias in the measurement results of this study represents a current challenge with BIA compared with that of DXA, and there is still room for improvement. The convenient BIA method for measuring whole-body BMD may be useful in the application of primary screening and future development of BMD assessment methods. BIA is widely used to measure body composition, but its application to the measurement of BMD represents a novel technological breakthrough.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80721-7
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis

Lee-Ping Chu, Hsueh-Kuan Lu, Pin Su, Kuen-Chang Hsieh et al.
8 citations
Scientific Reports
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
2.61
article

Comparison of whole body bone mineral density measurements between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and novel bioelectrical impedance analysis

Lee-Ping Chu, Hsueh-Kuan Lu, Pin Su, Kuen-Chang Hsieh, Chih-Lin Chuang, Chung-Liang Lai, Ai-Chun Huang
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Bone mineral density (BMD) is a crucial indicator of osteoporosis. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) introduces a new method for assessing body composition, specifically BMD measurement. Compared with existing ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for BMD screening and diagnosis, BIA has the advantages of safety, convenience and speed. However, the accuracy of BIA for BMD measurement needs to be explored. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the novel BIA technique in conducting whole-body BMD assessments in the general population of Taiwan. Overall, 318 healthy adults in Taiwan (37.67 ± 19.44 years of age; 145 male and 173 female patients) were included. Whole-body BMD was measured via foot-to-foot BIA-StarBIA-201 (StarBIA Meditek Co. LTD, Taichung, Taiwan) and the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) Lunar Prodigy technology (GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). Linear regression analysis, Pearson's correlation coefficient, the Bland-Altman plot, and paired t tests were used. The whole-body BMDs measured by BIA and DXA were 1.139 ± 0.124 g/cm<sup>2</sup> and 1.202 ± 0.168 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737, - 0.053 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The regression equation was y = 1.057x + 0.063. The Pearson correlation coefficient, mean difference, and limits of agreement were r = 0.737 (p < 0.001), - 0.053 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, and - 0.290-0.165 g/cm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. Standing BIA was correlated with the DXA gold standard for estimating whole-body BMD in adults; however, its interchangeability remains limited. The potential bias in the measurement results of this study represents a current challenge with BIA compared with that of DXA, and there is still room for improvement. The convenient BIA method for measuring whole-body BMD may be useful in the application of primary screening and future development of BMD assessment methods. BIA is widely used to measure body composition, but its application to the measurement of BMD represents a novel technological breakthrough.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Asia University (TW), National Kaohsiung University of Hospitality and Tourism (TW), National Chung Hsing University (TW), China Medical University (TW), Jen-Ai Hospital (TW), Ministry of Health and Welfare (TW), China Medical University Hospital (TW), National Taiwan University of Sport (TW)
China Medical University, Division of Materials Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
2.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.