Public perception of the civil-military and human rights abuses in North-Eastern Nigeria

This article explores public attitudes towards civil-military relations and human rights violations in northeastern Nigeria, a region badly afflicted by the ongoing insurgency and conflict involving Boko Haram and other armed groups. This research may cover such aspects as the perception of local communities on Nigerian military and counterinsurgency operations, human rights implications of military actions and civil-military relations or trust between civilian volunteers and armed forces. Recognizing the tension that exists between national security and citizens' rights, this article discusses some of the core issues — military deployments to civilian areas with a focus on deaths of civilians, internal displacement of civilians, arbitrary arrests and several other allegations surrounding these violations of human rights. This paper reflects perspectives from various stakeholders — local civilians, internally displaced persons (IDPs), human rights organizations and armed forces personnel. It is inarguable that military presence is needed for security, yet there are fears over the heavy-handed elements of UNSCR 1973 which often increase civilian suffering. This paper adopts a form-oriented theory of structural functionalism, which suggested that social phenomena belong to a domain – or level – of existence separate from psychical and biological facts using qualitative approach. From this perspective, the paper concludes its discussion by contributing to our understanding of the broader consequences of civil-military relations in zones of armed substitute and develop brazen intercontinental policy reform that promotes human right, accountability and community involvement. It is a new way of planning military operations; one that recognizes that while there are legitimate security needs, it should not come at the expense of providing citizens with their fundamental rights and freedoms, creating opportunities for better trust and collaboration between communities in northeastern Nigeria and the state.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Global Social Sciences
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58934/jgss.v5i20.295
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public perception of the civil-military and human rights abuses in North-Eastern Nigeria

M. J. Gidado
1 citations
Journal of Global Social Sciences
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
1.13
article

Public perception of the civil-military and human rights abuses in North-Eastern Nigeria

M. J. Gidado
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores public attitudes towards civil-military relations and human rights violations in northeastern Nigeria, a region badly afflicted by the ongoing insurgency and conflict involving Boko Haram and other armed groups. This research may cover such aspects as the perception of local communities on Nigerian military and counterinsurgency operations, human rights implications of military actions and civil-military relations or trust between civilian volunteers and armed forces. Recognizing the tension that exists between national security and citizens' rights, this article discusses some of the core issues — military deployments to civilian areas with a focus on deaths of civilians, internal displacement of civilians, arbitrary arrests and several other allegations surrounding these violations of human rights. This paper reflects perspectives from various stakeholders — local civilians, internally displaced persons (IDPs), human rights organizations and armed forces personnel. It is inarguable that military presence is needed for security, yet there are fears over the heavy-handed elements of UNSCR 1973 which often increase civilian suffering. This paper adopts a form-oriented theory of structural functionalism, which suggested that social phenomena belong to a domain – or level – of existence separate from psychical and biological facts using qualitative approach. From this perspective, the paper concludes its discussion by contributing to our understanding of the broader consequences of civil-military relations in zones of armed substitute and develop brazen intercontinental policy reform that promotes human right, accountability and community involvement. It is a new way of planning military operations; one that recognizes that while there are legitimate security needs, it should not come at the expense of providing citizens with their fundamental rights and freedoms, creating opportunities for better trust and collaboration between communities in northeastern Nigeria and the state.

Journal of Global Social SciencesVol. 5(20)
National Open University of Nigeria (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.