One-Factor versus Two-Factor Theory of Delusion: Replies to Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof

Abstract I would like to thank Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof for their stimulating comments on my 2023 paper in Neuroethics . In this reply, I will (1) articulate some deeper disagreements that may underpin our disagreement on the nature of delusion, (2) clarify their misrepresentation of my previous arguments as a defence of the two-factor theory in particular, and (3) finally conduct a comparison between the Maherian one-factor theory and the two-factor theory, showing that the two-factor theory is better supported by evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroethics
Published
2024-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-024-09575-0
Primary Topic
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

One-Factor versus Two-Factor Theory of Delusion: Replies to Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof

Chenwei Nie
Neuroethics
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
article

One-Factor versus Two-Factor Theory of Delusion: Replies to Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof

Chenwei Nie
article en

Abstract

Abstract I would like to thank Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof for their stimulating comments on my 2023 paper in Neuroethics . In this reply, I will (1) articulate some deeper disagreements that may underpin our disagreement on the nature of delusion, (2) clarify their misrepresentation of my previous arguments as a defence of the two-factor theory in particular, and (3) finally conduct a comparison between the Maherian one-factor theory and the two-factor theory, showing that the two-factor theory is better supported by evidence.

NeuroethicsVol. 18(1)
University of Warwick (GB)
Leverhulme Trust, National Social Science Fund of China
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.