One-Factor versus Two-Factor Theory of Delusion: Replies to Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof
Abstract I would like to thank Sullivan-Bissett and Noordhof for their stimulating comments on my 2023 paper in Neuroethics . In this reply, I will (1) articulate some deeper disagreements that may underpin our disagreement on the nature of delusion, (2) clarify their misrepresentation of my previous arguments as a defence of the two-factor theory in particular, and (3) finally conduct a comparison between the Maherian one-factor theory and the two-factor theory, showing that the two-factor theory is better supported by evidence.
Authors
- Chenwei Nie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-8879)
Institutions
- University of Warwick (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Neuroethics
- Published
- 2024-11-25
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-024-09575-0
- Primary Topic
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- National Social Science Fund of China