Male lone wolves and sociable females – Preferences for shared and AV transport services

This paper examines preferences for future transports, focusing specifically on shared transports and autonomous vehicles, in a national context. A choice experiment approach is applied in which respondents are asked to choose between individual and shared transport services, each associated with different attribute levels (driver/autonomous, waiting and travel times, and costs) for a trip to go grocery shopping. Data are analysed by applying latent class modelling, which facilitates the analysis of heterogeneity in preferences for the attributes across different groups in the sample. The results reveal three groups with considerable heterogeneity in preferences: the group accepting trade-offs , the lone-wolves, and the sociable. The trade-off group do not want to share transport, but are positive towards autonomous vehicles, and make trade-offs between these characteristics and costs. The members in the lone-wolves group are only concerned about not travelling in a shared transport. Members in the smallest sociable group are positive about sharing transports but reject autonomous vehicles. Women are overrepresented in the sociable group, as are people with environmental concern and those who lack a driver's licence. Overall, we find that a majority of the sample does not want to share transport services, which potentially constitutes a major challenge for policy makers regarding reaching environmental transport policy goals. • We find considerable preference heterogeneity towards shared transport services when grocery shopping. • A large majority of respondents reject shared transport services. • Less than a quarter of the respondents prefer shared transports over private. • Females and environmentally concerned are more likely to be positive to sharing. • Respondents in metropolitan areas are more positive towards transports in autonomous vehicles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Transportation Economics
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2024.101493
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Male lone wolves and sociable females – Preferences for shared and AV transport services

Linda Wårell, Kristina Ek
2 citations
Research in Transportation Economics
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.41
article

Male lone wolves and sociable females – Preferences for shared and AV transport services

Linda Wårell, Kristina Ek
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This paper examines preferences for future transports, focusing specifically on shared transports and autonomous vehicles, in a national context. A choice experiment approach is applied in which respondents are asked to choose between individual and shared transport services, each associated with different attribute levels (driver/autonomous, waiting and travel times, and costs) for a trip to go grocery shopping. Data are analysed by applying latent class modelling, which facilitates the analysis of heterogeneity in preferences for the attributes across different groups in the sample. The results reveal three groups with considerable heterogeneity in preferences: the group accepting trade-offs , the lone-wolves, and the sociable. The trade-off group do not want to share transport, but are positive towards autonomous vehicles, and make trade-offs between these characteristics and costs. The members in the lone-wolves group are only concerned about not travelling in a shared transport. Members in the smallest sociable group are positive about sharing transports but reject autonomous vehicles. Women are overrepresented in the sociable group, as are people with environmental concern and those who lack a driver's licence. Overall, we find that a majority of the sample does not want to share transport services, which potentially constitutes a major challenge for policy makers regarding reaching environmental transport policy goals. • We find considerable preference heterogeneity towards shared transport services when grocery shopping. • A large majority of respondents reject shared transport services. • Less than a quarter of the respondents prefer shared transports over private. • Females and environmentally concerned are more likely to be positive to sharing. • Respondents in metropolitan areas are more positive towards transports in autonomous vehicles.

Research in Transportation EconomicsVol. 108
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Energimyndigheten
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
0.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.