Látencia és felszínre kerülés kapcsolati erőszak esetén

Aim: The study aims to highlight methodological issues in estimating exposure to domestic violence (DV). It also aims to provide information on the reasons for underreporting DV cases. Methodology: The researchers rely on data available in the Unified Criminal Statistics of the Investigating Authority and the Prosecutor's Office to describe the number of victims of domestic violence. They also present some findings of a representative survey. Findings: Latency is high in cases of domestic violence. The difficulty in accurately estimating latency is that different data collection methods and different research questions reveal different levels of exposure. Police have a crucial role in the disclosure of DV. The main reason for under-reporting is the emotional state of the victims (including embarrassment and shame) who sometimes would like to keep the abuse a secret. Value: According to the study, different data collections and methodologies may give different estimations about the number of victims of DV. Information on the reasons for non-reporting can increase the efficiency of professionals, aiming at the prevention and response to domestic violence. In light of the results, especially the high proportion of male victims, further research questions can be identified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Belügyi Szemle
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38146/bsz-ajia.2024.v72.i11.pp2061-2076
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Látencia és felszínre kerülés kapcsolati erőszak esetén

Gábor Héra, Mónika Füstös, Z. MESZAROS
2 citations
Belügyi Szemle
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
1.06
article

Látencia és felszínre kerülés kapcsolati erőszak esetén

Gábor Héra, Mónika Füstös, Z. MESZAROS
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Aim: The study aims to highlight methodological issues in estimating exposure to domestic violence (DV). It also aims to provide information on the reasons for underreporting DV cases. Methodology: The researchers rely on data available in the Unified Criminal Statistics of the Investigating Authority and the Prosecutor's Office to describe the number of victims of domestic violence. They also present some findings of a representative survey. Findings: Latency is high in cases of domestic violence. The difficulty in accurately estimating latency is that different data collection methods and different research questions reveal different levels of exposure. Police have a crucial role in the disclosure of DV. The main reason for under-reporting is the emotional state of the victims (including embarrassment and shame) who sometimes would like to keep the abuse a secret. Value: According to the study, different data collections and methodologies may give different estimations about the number of victims of DV. Information on the reasons for non-reporting can increase the efficiency of professionals, aiming at the prevention and response to domestic violence. In light of the results, especially the high proportion of male victims, further research questions can be identified.

Belügyi SzemleVol. 72(11)
Ludovika University of Public Service (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
1.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Látencia és felszínre kerülés kapcsolati erőszak esetén — Gábor Héra, Mónika Füstös, et al. · Belügyi Szemle (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS