An Analytical Comparison of the Performance of Various Sensing Materials and Mechanisms for Efficient Detection Capability of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as methane (CH 4 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), from agricultural practices and land use have increased concerns about global warming. Accurate quantification of the GHG using gas sensors is essential for effective management and sustainable agricultural practices. The objective of this study was to make an analytical comparison of the performance of various sensing materials for CH 4 -, N 2 O-, and CO 2 -based sensors in terms of sensitivity, response ratio, response time, and recovery time to establish an efficiency detection level of the GHG emissions. A literature review of 95 different studies showed that palladium–tin dioxide (Pd-SnO 2 ) nanoparticles, indium oxide (In 2 O 3 ) nanowires, and gold-lanthanum oxide-doped tin dioxide (Au-La 2 O 3 /SnO 2 ) nanofibers had better performance compared to other sensing materials in CH 4 -, N 2 O-, and CO 2 -based sensors, respectively. The findings from reviewed studies revealed that nanoporous structures, nanowires, and nanofibers had faster response and recovery compared to conventional materials due to their big specific surface area (SSA). The designed ternary hybrid structure of sensing materials was more effective for CO 2 gas detection than the double hybrid structure, unlike CH 4 - and N 2 O-based sensors. However, constructive suggestions for researchers were discussed in the conclusion based on the current research status and challenges to improve the performance of GHG sensors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2024.11.008
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analytical Comparison of the Performance of Various Sensing Materials and Mechanisms for Efficient Detection Capability of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Mostafa Rastgou, Yong He, Qianjing Jiang
3 citations
Engineering
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
0.63
article

An Analytical Comparison of the Performance of Various Sensing Materials and Mechanisms for Efficient Detection Capability of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Mostafa Rastgou, Yong He, Qianjing Jiang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as methane (CH 4 ), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), from agricultural practices and land use have increased concerns about global warming. Accurate quantification of the GHG using gas sensors is essential for effective management and sustainable agricultural practices. The objective of this study was to make an analytical comparison of the performance of various sensing materials for CH 4 -, N 2 O-, and CO 2 -based sensors in terms of sensitivity, response ratio, response time, and recovery time to establish an efficiency detection level of the GHG emissions. A literature review of 95 different studies showed that palladium–tin dioxide (Pd-SnO 2 ) nanoparticles, indium oxide (In 2 O 3 ) nanowires, and gold-lanthanum oxide-doped tin dioxide (Au-La 2 O 3 /SnO 2 ) nanofibers had better performance compared to other sensing materials in CH 4 -, N 2 O-, and CO 2 -based sensors, respectively. The findings from reviewed studies revealed that nanoporous structures, nanowires, and nanofibers had faster response and recovery compared to conventional materials due to their big specific surface area (SSA). The designed ternary hybrid structure of sensing materials was more effective for CO 2 gas detection than the double hybrid structure, unlike CH 4 - and N 2 O-based sensors. However, constructive suggestions for researchers were discussed in the conclusion based on the current research status and challenges to improve the performance of GHG sensors.

EngineeringVol. 56
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
0.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.