Public support for novel interventions to protect, restore, and accelerate adaptation to climate change in the Great Barrier Reef

Novel technological interventions are under development to build the resilience of ecosystems by providing short-term protection from climate extremes, enhancing recovery from disturbance, and accelerating adaptation to changed climate states. Drawing on surveys of Australian residents ( n = 5320) conducted in 2018 and 2022, this paper investigates support for the development and deployment of six novel interventions on the Great Barrier Reef (marine cloud brightening, fogging, rubble stabilization, coral seeding, natural breeding for heat tolerance, and genetic engineering) and how support varies across time, social groups, perception of climate risk, and approach to intervention. It finds strong support for research and small-scale trials of all six interventions although support was highest for coral seeding, followed by rubble stabilization, fogging, natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Reflecting their early stage of development, support for large-scale deployment of novel interventions across the Great Barrier Reef moderated, with respondents indicating strongest support for deployment of coral seeding, rubble stabilization, and fogging and lower support for natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Trust in science to deliver solutions was a consistently strong predictor of support for both intervention R&D and large-scale deployment. The perceived ability to identify and test environmental impacts was a strong predictor of support for scaled deployment. Perceived climate threat, trust in the Reef's management authority, and ethics were also consistently associated with support for intervention R&D and implementation. With the vast majority of Australian residents supporting strong action to protect and restore coral reefs the maintenance of trust in scientists and scientific institutions stands out as critical to support for the implementation of novel interventions at scale, including the ability of researchers to identify and assess the environmental risks of these interventions. • Australians support novel technological interventions on Great Barrier Reef. • Trust in science is a consistent predictor of support for research and deployment. • Belief that environmental impacts can be identified and tested is a critical predictor of support for deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ocean & Coastal Management
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2024.107489
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.32

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public support for novel interventions to protect, restore, and accelerate adaptation to climate change in the Great Barrier Reef

C. Stephan Demeter, Stewart Lockie, Lintje Sie, Brent W. Ritchie et al.
10 citations
Ocean & Coastal Management
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
11.32
article

Public support for novel interventions to protect, restore, and accelerate adaptation to climate change in the Great Barrier Reef

C. Stephan Demeter, Stewart Lockie, Lintje Sie, Brent W. Ritchie, Henry A. Bartelet, Bruce Taylor
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Novel technological interventions are under development to build the resilience of ecosystems by providing short-term protection from climate extremes, enhancing recovery from disturbance, and accelerating adaptation to changed climate states. Drawing on surveys of Australian residents ( n = 5320) conducted in 2018 and 2022, this paper investigates support for the development and deployment of six novel interventions on the Great Barrier Reef (marine cloud brightening, fogging, rubble stabilization, coral seeding, natural breeding for heat tolerance, and genetic engineering) and how support varies across time, social groups, perception of climate risk, and approach to intervention. It finds strong support for research and small-scale trials of all six interventions although support was highest for coral seeding, followed by rubble stabilization, fogging, natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Reflecting their early stage of development, support for large-scale deployment of novel interventions across the Great Barrier Reef moderated, with respondents indicating strongest support for deployment of coral seeding, rubble stabilization, and fogging and lower support for natural breeding, marine cloud brightening, and genetic engineering. Trust in science to deliver solutions was a consistently strong predictor of support for both intervention R&D and large-scale deployment. The perceived ability to identify and test environmental impacts was a strong predictor of support for scaled deployment. Perceived climate threat, trust in the Reef's management authority, and ethics were also consistently associated with support for intervention R&D and implementation. With the vast majority of Australian residents supporting strong action to protect and restore coral reefs the maintenance of trust in scientists and scientific institutions stands out as critical to support for the implementation of novel interventions at scale, including the ability of researchers to identify and assess the environmental risks of these interventions. • Australians support novel technological interventions on Great Barrier Reef. • Trust in science is a consistent predictor of support for research and deployment. • Belief that environmental impacts can be identified and tested is a critical predictor of support for deployment.

Ocean & Coastal ManagementVol. 260
Australian National University (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Cairns Hospital (AU), Queensland Department of Environment and Science (AU), Ecosystem Sciences (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Australian Government, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
11.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.