Analysis of the potential for photovoltaic energy generation

According to data from EPC (Engineering, Procurement and Construction) companies, the difference between the installed power in kWp and the power at the DC input of the inverter is in the order of −10% to −30% in photovoltaic installations at the same latitude and longitude as the one studied in this paper. The losses decrease in the case of installations with fixed structures on the ground that facilitates heat dissipation during the generation of energy. For the 400kWp experimental unit, the difference between the installed power and the power injected into the grid was approximately −12% (real data) and the total simulated losses were −9.6%, of which −5.1% corresponded to PV loss due to temperature. Mitigating losses caused by an increase in module temperature depends on systems that generally need to be energized in order to function, which is economically unfeasible. A low-cost solution resides in the use of green ground cover and taller structures. A comparison was made with the electric current and power of the photovoltaic system, and it was concluded that there is a possibility that dirt is interfering with mismatch losses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Green Energy
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2024.2432573
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the potential for photovoltaic energy generation

Marcelo Espósito, Oumaima Mesbahi, Taís Rosângela Correia Souza
3 citations
International Journal of Green Energy
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
1.04
article

Analysis of the potential for photovoltaic energy generation

Marcelo Espósito, Oumaima Mesbahi, Taís Rosângela Correia Souza
article en
3 citations

Abstract

According to data from EPC (Engineering, Procurement and Construction) companies, the difference between the installed power in kWp and the power at the DC input of the inverter is in the order of −10% to −30% in photovoltaic installations at the same latitude and longitude as the one studied in this paper. The losses decrease in the case of installations with fixed structures on the ground that facilitates heat dissipation during the generation of energy. For the 400kWp experimental unit, the difference between the installed power and the power injected into the grid was approximately −12% (real data) and the total simulated losses were −9.6%, of which −5.1% corresponded to PV loss due to temperature. Mitigating losses caused by an increase in module temperature depends on systems that generally need to be energized in order to function, which is economically unfeasible. A low-cost solution resides in the use of green ground cover and taller structures. A comparison was made with the electric current and power of the photovoltaic system, and it was concluded that there is a possibility that dirt is interfering with mismatch losses.

International Journal of Green EnergyVol. 22(7)
University of Minnesota (US), University of Évora (PT), University of Minnesota System (US), Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul (BR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis of the potential for photovoltaic energy generation — Marcelo Espósito, Oumaima Mesbahi, et al. · International Journal of Green Energy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS