Delay Discounting and Risk Tolerance in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Results From the Global OCD Study

Although obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) features maladaptive decision making, previous research examining economic decision making in OCD has yielded inconsistent results. Here we examined whether unmedicated adults with OCD (<i>n</i> = 268) differ from healthy controls (HC; <i>n</i> = 256) on two measures of decision making about potential rewards: 1) delay discounting, the tendency to prefer rewards sooner rather than later, even if the delayed reward is larger, and 2) risk tolerance, the willingness to gamble for uncertain rewards when the risk is known. Data were collected in Brazil, India, the Netherlands, South Africa, and the USA as part of the Global OCD study. After controlling for age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, IQ, and site, individuals with OCD did not differ from HC in either delay discounting or risk tolerance. However, patients with OCD who reported more anxiety and depression showed higher delay discounting, or a relative preference for immediate rewards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241289927
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Delay Discounting and Risk Tolerance in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Results From the Global OCD Study

Dianne M. Hezel, Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy, Benjamin Huber, Marcelo C. Batistuzzo et al.
1 citations
Clinical Psychological Science
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
0.64
article

Delay Discounting and Risk Tolerance in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Results From the Global OCD Study

Dianne M. Hezel, Janardhanan C. Narayanaswamy, Benjamin Huber, Marcelo C. Batistuzzo, H. Blair Simpson, Niels T. de Joode, Clara Marincowitz, Odile A. van den Heuvel, Karolina M. Lempert, Dan Joseph Stein, Christine Löchner, Melanie Wall, Karthik Sheshachala
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) features maladaptive decision making, previous research examining economic decision making in OCD has yielded inconsistent results. Here we examined whether unmedicated adults with OCD (<i>n</i> = 268) differ from healthy controls (HC; <i>n</i> = 256) on two measures of decision making about potential rewards: 1) delay discounting, the tendency to prefer rewards sooner rather than later, even if the delayed reward is larger, and 2) risk tolerance, the willingness to gamble for uncertain rewards when the risk is known. Data were collected in Brazil, India, the Netherlands, South Africa, and the USA as part of the Global OCD study. After controlling for age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, IQ, and site, individuals with OCD did not differ from HC in either delay discounting or risk tolerance. However, patients with OCD who reported more anxiety and depression showed higher delay discounting, or a relative preference for immediate rewards.

Clinical Psychological ScienceVol. 13(3)
South African Medical Research Council (ZA), Deakin University (AU), University of Cape Town (ZA), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Stellenbosch University (ZA), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), University Medical Center (US), New York State Office of Mental Health (US), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), New York State Psychiatric Institute, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences (IN), Adelphi University (US), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo (BR)
Sanofi, Vistagen Therapeutics, University of Cambridge, Servier, H. Lundbeck A/S, National Institute of Mental Health
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.