Mobilization of grassland soil arsenic stores due to agronomic management

The fate of arsenic in mineral soil stores over time is poorly understood. Here we examined arsenic loss over five decades from a managed grassland soil profile through analysing archived material from a long-term slurry (LTS) experiment at Hillsborough, Northern Ireland. A randomized block experiment was established in 1970 where a perennial ryegrass sward was seeded onto the site and subjected to control (no fertilization) and fertilization treatments using conventional (i.e. at farmers recommended application rate) mineral NPK fertilizer, and pig and cow slurry treatments. Soil (0-5, 5-10 and 10-15 cm), slurry applied, and sward off-take was archived each year. A mass-balance calculation found that control soils lost no arsenic down the 15 cm depth soil profile, the NPK treatment had a 10 % loss, while cow slurry caused 25 % loss, and a 35 % loss was observed for pig slurry. For treatments with arsenic loss, removal was linear over the 50 years of study in 2 out of the 3 blocks, with the 3rd block showing little or no change. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) found that arsenic was most positively associated with soil magnesium, manganese and nickel, while negatively associated with pH, organic carbon, phosphorus and silicon. Laser ablation - inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) of soil found that arsenic association with lead mineralogy could potentially explain why there was a gradient in arsenic loss across the experimental plots. Slurry and atmospheric inputs, and sward off-take had little impact on the soil arsenic mass-balance. The findings suggest that leaching loss down the soil profile was the mechanism of loss of arsenic. The applicability of the LTS experimental site arsenic findings to other soils is discussed, as is the implication for the global biogeochemical cycling of those soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177702
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobilization of grassland soil arsenic stores due to agronomic management

Caroline Meharg, Manus Carey, Andrew A. Meharg, Jonathan E. Holland et al.
2 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
0.50
article

Mobilization of grassland soil arsenic stores due to agronomic management

Caroline Meharg, Manus Carey, Andrew A. Meharg, Jonathan E. Holland, Coalain McCreanor, Weiqing Jia
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The fate of arsenic in mineral soil stores over time is poorly understood. Here we examined arsenic loss over five decades from a managed grassland soil profile through analysing archived material from a long-term slurry (LTS) experiment at Hillsborough, Northern Ireland. A randomized block experiment was established in 1970 where a perennial ryegrass sward was seeded onto the site and subjected to control (no fertilization) and fertilization treatments using conventional (i.e. at farmers recommended application rate) mineral NPK fertilizer, and pig and cow slurry treatments. Soil (0-5, 5-10 and 10-15 cm), slurry applied, and sward off-take was archived each year. A mass-balance calculation found that control soils lost no arsenic down the 15 cm depth soil profile, the NPK treatment had a 10 % loss, while cow slurry caused 25 % loss, and a 35 % loss was observed for pig slurry. For treatments with arsenic loss, removal was linear over the 50 years of study in 2 out of the 3 blocks, with the 3rd block showing little or no change. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) found that arsenic was most positively associated with soil magnesium, manganese and nickel, while negatively associated with pH, organic carbon, phosphorus and silicon. Laser ablation - inductively coupled plasma - mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) of soil found that arsenic association with lead mineralogy could potentially explain why there was a gradient in arsenic loss across the experimental plots. Slurry and atmospheric inputs, and sward off-take had little impact on the soil arsenic mass-balance. The findings suggest that leaching loss down the soil profile was the mechanism of loss of arsenic. The applicability of the LTS experimental site arsenic findings to other soils is discussed, as is the implication for the global biogeochemical cycling of those soils.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 957
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Agri Food and Biosciences Institute (GB)
Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs, UK Government
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.