Environmental assessment of green wall: A comparison between Australia and Italy

Green infrastructure can enhance and complement aspects of sustainable urban development, such as water management, climate change mitigation, urban heat island effects, and energy consumption in buildings. This study explores environmental performances and sustainable development benefits of green wall systems, emphasizing their role in urban settings, increasing public awareness of their benefits and leading to optimal environmental design for developers, investors, and designers. This study aims to contribute to the knowledge on the environmental performance of green wall systems, using life cycle assessment (LCA), available in different markets. A life cycle assessment has been performed for a case study in Australia (APB-GW) using local designs, materials, and environmental settings, and then it has been compared to the environmental performance of green wall systems in Italy (IPB-GW and IFB-GW). Challenges in implementation, such as material sustainability and public awareness, are discussed, alongside potential solutions. The Australian solution is characterized not only by the lowest global warming emission (64.7 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq) compared to 163.2 and 144.9 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq of the other solutions but also by an impact reduction across all categories, attributed to use of eco-friendly materials and production techniques. Urban surfaces often absorb and retain large amounts of heat, contributing to UHI effect. Using materials and technologies with lower GWP that also have higher solar reflectance can help to reduce surface temperature of buildings and streets. It is possible to work towards an increase in sustainability of the technology itself, using research findings to promote innovative design and exchange of knowledge and technologies between different markets, which then reflects lower carbon footprint at the level of building design and higher sustainability at urban planning. Then, as urban realities continue to grow, climate change adaptation, reduction of environmental impacts integrating GIs, like these ones, will be essential creating resilient, sustainable and livable urban spaces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177699
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental assessment of green wall: A comparison between Australia and Italy

Milad Reyhani, Daniele Torreggiani, Alberto Barbaresi, Ruby N Michael et al.
8 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Urban Green Space and Health
2.52
article

Environmental assessment of green wall: A comparison between Australia and Italy

Milad Reyhani, Daniele Torreggiani, Alberto Barbaresi, Ruby N Michael, Patrizia Tassinari, Enrica Santolini
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Green infrastructure can enhance and complement aspects of sustainable urban development, such as water management, climate change mitigation, urban heat island effects, and energy consumption in buildings. This study explores environmental performances and sustainable development benefits of green wall systems, emphasizing their role in urban settings, increasing public awareness of their benefits and leading to optimal environmental design for developers, investors, and designers. This study aims to contribute to the knowledge on the environmental performance of green wall systems, using life cycle assessment (LCA), available in different markets. A life cycle assessment has been performed for a case study in Australia (APB-GW) using local designs, materials, and environmental settings, and then it has been compared to the environmental performance of green wall systems in Italy (IPB-GW and IFB-GW). Challenges in implementation, such as material sustainability and public awareness, are discussed, alongside potential solutions. The Australian solution is characterized not only by the lowest global warming emission (64.7 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq) compared to 163.2 and 144.9 kgCO<sub>2</sub>eq of the other solutions but also by an impact reduction across all categories, attributed to use of eco-friendly materials and production techniques. Urban surfaces often absorb and retain large amounts of heat, contributing to UHI effect. Using materials and technologies with lower GWP that also have higher solar reflectance can help to reduce surface temperature of buildings and streets. It is possible to work towards an increase in sustainability of the technology itself, using research findings to promote innovative design and exchange of knowledge and technologies between different markets, which then reflects lower carbon footprint at the level of building design and higher sustainability at urban planning. Then, as urban realities continue to grow, climate change adaptation, reduction of environmental impacts integrating GIs, like these ones, will be essential creating resilient, sustainable and livable urban spaces.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 957
Griffith University (AU), University of Bologna (IT)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Urban Green Space and Health
2.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.