Men’s Health in Disasters: A Systematic Scoping Review

Background: Disasters affect men and women unequally. While both male and female populations have their own needs, capacities and vulnerabilities, little is known about the men’s health status in disasters. Thus, the present review is aimed to identify and explain the impacts of disasters on men’s health status in the world. Methods: The current scoping review was conducted using PRISMA protocol 2020. Web of Sciences, PubMed, Scopus databases were searched using related keywords. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select the relevant references. EndNote software, version 17, was applied to manage the citations. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: A number of 13 references was selected for final analysis after screening process. Physical and sexual health were the most frequent aspects of men’s health which was studied by the gender and disaster researchers (23.1%). Men’s health aspects in disasters were categorized as physical health, mental health, social health and sexual health. Conclusion: Men are visible as the capable group in disasters and their health needs (physical, mental, social, sexual and spiritual health) may likely not be considered post-disasters. Developing gender analysis tools for assessing the vulnerabilities, needs and health status of male population in disasters as well as establishing a sex-disaggregated database for effective decision-making regarding men’s health during disasters are highly suggested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Iranian Medical Council
Published
2024-11-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/jimc.v8i1.17055
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Men’s Health in Disasters: A Systematic Scoping Review

Akbar Eslami, Sanaz Sohrabizadeh
1 citations
Journal of Iranian Medical Council
Resilience and Mental Health
0.64
article

Men’s Health in Disasters: A Systematic Scoping Review

Akbar Eslami, Sanaz Sohrabizadeh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Disasters affect men and women unequally. While both male and female populations have their own needs, capacities and vulnerabilities, little is known about the men’s health status in disasters. Thus, the present review is aimed to identify and explain the impacts of disasters on men’s health status in the world. Methods: The current scoping review was conducted using PRISMA protocol 2020. Web of Sciences, PubMed, Scopus databases were searched using related keywords. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select the relevant references. EndNote software, version 17, was applied to manage the citations. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: A number of 13 references was selected for final analysis after screening process. Physical and sexual health were the most frequent aspects of men’s health which was studied by the gender and disaster researchers (23.1%). Men’s health aspects in disasters were categorized as physical health, mental health, social health and sexual health. Conclusion: Men are visible as the capable group in disasters and their health needs (physical, mental, social, sexual and spiritual health) may likely not be considered post-disasters. Developing gender analysis tools for assessing the vulnerabilities, needs and health status of male population in disasters as well as establishing a sex-disaggregated database for effective decision-making regarding men’s health during disasters are highly suggested.

Journal of Iranian Medical Council
Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Resilience and Mental Health
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.