Comparison of detailed large-scale Thermal Energy Storage simulation models

Numerical modelling of large-scale thermal energy storage (TES) systems plays a fundamental role in their planning, design and integration into energy systems, i.e., district heating networks. This work presents a comparison of the implementation of numerical models of buried TES in Matlab and Comsol. Both tools allow the modelling of the surrounding ground with the finite-element method, while the water domain is modelled one-dimensionally. The Comsol model allows a high level of detail and flexibility and is recommended for TES optimization in a system context. The Matlab model, on the other hand, is more simplified with a focus on fast system simulations. The models are compared in terms of energy flows, temperature stratification and simulation performance. Different TES geometries are investigated, i.e., tank and pit with various slopes, different envelope qualities (i.e., insulation) are considered. In terms of energy flows, the two models are in good agreement, however, deviations in the thermal stratification are found between the two modelling approaches

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of BauSIM
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26868/29761662.2024.3
Primary Topic
Power Systems and Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of detailed large-scale Thermal Energy Storage simulation models

Fabian Ochs, Alice Tosatto
Proceedings of BauSIM
Power Systems and Renewable Energy
article

Comparison of detailed large-scale Thermal Energy Storage simulation models

Fabian Ochs, Alice Tosatto
article en

Abstract

Numerical modelling of large-scale thermal energy storage (TES) systems plays a fundamental role in their planning, design and integration into energy systems, i.e., district heating networks. This work presents a comparison of the implementation of numerical models of buried TES in Matlab and Comsol. Both tools allow the modelling of the surrounding ground with the finite-element method, while the water domain is modelled one-dimensionally. The Comsol model allows a high level of detail and flexibility and is recommended for TES optimization in a system context. The Matlab model, on the other hand, is more simplified with a focus on fast system simulations. The models are compared in terms of energy flows, temperature stratification and simulation performance. Different TES geometries are investigated, i.e., tank and pit with various slopes, different envelope qualities (i.e., insulation) are considered. In terms of energy flows, the two models are in good agreement, however, deviations in the thermal stratification are found between the two modelling approaches

Proceedings of BauSIMVol. 10
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Power Systems and Renewable Energy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.