The bureaucratic reputation scale: cross-country and cross-language validation

This article validates the bureaucratic reputation scale developed by Lee and Van Ryzin (2019) across diverse countries and languages. Surveys were conducted in New Zealand, Austria, Denmark, and the Netherlands, with respondents evaluating the reputations of their national banks. Results indicate configural, metric, and scalar equivalence across the four countries, affirming the scale’s effectiveness. This study contributes to cross-cultural assessment tools for bureaucratic reputation, offering insights into potential refinements and broadening the understanding of administrative perceptions across various international contexts. We conclude that the bureaucratic reputation scale is a powerful and valuable tool for comparative analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Management Review
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2024.2428718
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Identity and Reputation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The bureaucratic reputation scale: cross-country and cross-language validation

Jürgen Willems, А. П. Андреева
2 citations
Public Management Review
Corporate Identity and Reputation
1.11
article

The bureaucratic reputation scale: cross-country and cross-language validation

Jürgen Willems, А. П. Андреева
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article validates the bureaucratic reputation scale developed by Lee and Van Ryzin (2019) across diverse countries and languages. Surveys were conducted in New Zealand, Austria, Denmark, and the Netherlands, with respondents evaluating the reputations of their national banks. Results indicate configural, metric, and scalar equivalence across the four countries, affirming the scale’s effectiveness. This study contributes to cross-cultural assessment tools for bureaucratic reputation, offering insights into potential refinements and broadening the understanding of administrative perceptions across various international contexts. We conclude that the bureaucratic reputation scale is a powerful and valuable tool for comparative analyses.

Public Management ReviewVol. 27(10)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Corporate Identity and Reputation
1.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.