Robust design methodologies to engineer multimaterial and multiscale bioprinters

Commonly used bioprinting technologies (e.g., material extrusion, material jetting) enable the fabrication of complex, multimaterial and multiscale scaffolds with controlled properties for tissue engineering applications. This enables the fabrication of scaffolds that more accurately replicate the structure of natural tissues. Despite the availability of commercial bioprinters, their high cost and lack of customization have driven researchers to modify existing devices or create entirely new platforms. Among all the available examples in literature, there is a strong need for more modular systems which are robustly designed taking into consideration the specific needs of bioprinting. In this context, the aim of this work is to introduce robust engineering methodologies to design and fabricate custom hardware and software for multimaterial and multiscale bioprinting. Firstly, we will identify the main design requirements that should be considered for a bioprinter (e.g., encumbrance, positioning resolution). Based on these requirements, we will then propose an analysis of the key building blocks of a bioprinter, including hardware (i.e., positioning system, toolheads, additional modules for extended functionalities), electronics (i.e., power supply, control boards), and software, introducing for each one the main concepts and equations for its optimal design. Throughout the work, we will use a customized bioprinting platform (namely, the BOOST bioprinter) as an example of the application of the proposed methodologies. Finally, we will present a validation of the methodologies and the bioprinter by fabricating high quality scaffolds through the combination of material extrusion and material jetting. The firmware developed during this work is available online as a support for developing more robust customized bioprinters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioprinting
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00372
Citations
3
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robust design methodologies to engineer multimaterial and multiscale bioprinters

Amedeo Franco Bonatti, Gabriele Maria Fortunato, Giovanni Vozzi, Carmelo De Maria et al.
3 citations
Bioprinting
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.55
article

Robust design methodologies to engineer multimaterial and multiscale bioprinters

Amedeo Franco Bonatti, Gabriele Maria Fortunato, Giovanni Vozzi, Carmelo De Maria, Elisa Batoni, Chiara Vitale‐Brovarone
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Commonly used bioprinting technologies (e.g., material extrusion, material jetting) enable the fabrication of complex, multimaterial and multiscale scaffolds with controlled properties for tissue engineering applications. This enables the fabrication of scaffolds that more accurately replicate the structure of natural tissues. Despite the availability of commercial bioprinters, their high cost and lack of customization have driven researchers to modify existing devices or create entirely new platforms. Among all the available examples in literature, there is a strong need for more modular systems which are robustly designed taking into consideration the specific needs of bioprinting. In this context, the aim of this work is to introduce robust engineering methodologies to design and fabricate custom hardware and software for multimaterial and multiscale bioprinting. Firstly, we will identify the main design requirements that should be considered for a bioprinter (e.g., encumbrance, positioning resolution). Based on these requirements, we will then propose an analysis of the key building blocks of a bioprinter, including hardware (i.e., positioning system, toolheads, additional modules for extended functionalities), electronics (i.e., power supply, control boards), and software, introducing for each one the main concepts and equations for its optimal design. Throughout the work, we will use a customized bioprinting platform (namely, the BOOST bioprinter) as an example of the application of the proposed methodologies. Finally, we will present a validation of the methodologies and the bioprinter by fabricating high quality scaffolds through the combination of material extrusion and material jetting. The firmware developed during this work is available online as a support for developing more robust customized bioprinters.

BioprintingVol. 44
University of Pisa (IT), Piaggio (Italy) (IT), Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.