Historical memory in remotely sensed soil moisture can enhance flash flood modeling for headwater catchments in Germany

• We infer soil water storage with antecedent remotely sensed (RS) soil moisture (SM) • Assimilating SMAP SM into LARSIM reduces mean percent error of flood peaks by 15% • Precipitation uncertainty dominates flash flood modeling despite our improvement • The suggested data assimilation framework can be transferred to other RS products The wetness precondition of a catchment affects available soil water storage capacity and infiltration rate, thus influences flash flood generation. Remotely sensed (RS) soil moisture (SM) can provide valuable information on catchment wetness, but typically only represents the top 5 cm of the land surface. However, hydrological models for flash flood simulation need to consider deeper layers to calculate the total soil water storage. Therefore, a key challenge is to link RS SM to total soil water storage and assimilate RS SM into flash flood models to correctly describe initial catchment wetness. In this study, we developed an approach to combine present and antecedent RS SM to infer present soil water storage based on four regression models. The inferred soil water storage from SMAP (soil moisture active passive) SM was assimilated into the operational LARSIM (Large Area Runoff Simulation Model) hydrological model. We tested this new approach with 12 events in the headwater catchments Körsch, Adenauer Bach and Fischbach in Germany. Results show that random forest regression performs the best among the four regression models. The BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) score suggests that regressions considering antecedent RS SM can well infer soil water storage, resulting in R 2 of 0.85, 0.94 and 0.93 for the Körsch, Adenauer Bach and Fischbach catchments, respectively. Compared to the open loop (without data assimilation) simulations, our approach enhanced the general performance of event simulations with average KGE increases of 0.09, 0.24 and 0.33 for the Körsch, Adenauer Bach and Fischbach, respectively; and the mean error in the 12 simulated event peaks is reduced 15 %. Moreover, the simulation uncertainty is reduced, too. The transferability of the proposed approach to other RS products is also discussed. Although assimilating RS SM can enhance flash flood modeling, it is primarily affected by the uncertainty in precipitation. In the future, the proposed approach should be tested with more catchments and events to verify its general validity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132395
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historical memory in remotely sensed soil moisture can enhance flash flood modeling for headwater catchments in Germany

Yan Liu, Harrie‐Jan Hendricks Franssen, Harry Vereecken, Julia Krumm et al.
4 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
0.82
article

Historical memory in remotely sensed soil moisture can enhance flash flood modeling for headwater catchments in Germany

Yan Liu, Harrie‐Jan Hendricks Franssen, Harry Vereecken, Julia Krumm, Dirk Aigner, Ingo Haag, Yong Chang, Visakh Sivaprasad
article en
4 citations

Abstract

• We infer soil water storage with antecedent remotely sensed (RS) soil moisture (SM) • Assimilating SMAP SM into LARSIM reduces mean percent error of flood peaks by 15% • Precipitation uncertainty dominates flash flood modeling despite our improvement • The suggested data assimilation framework can be transferred to other RS products The wetness precondition of a catchment affects available soil water storage capacity and infiltration rate, thus influences flash flood generation. Remotely sensed (RS) soil moisture (SM) can provide valuable information on catchment wetness, but typically only represents the top 5 cm of the land surface. However, hydrological models for flash flood simulation need to consider deeper layers to calculate the total soil water storage. Therefore, a key challenge is to link RS SM to total soil water storage and assimilate RS SM into flash flood models to correctly describe initial catchment wetness. In this study, we developed an approach to combine present and antecedent RS SM to infer present soil water storage based on four regression models. The inferred soil water storage from SMAP (soil moisture active passive) SM was assimilated into the operational LARSIM (Large Area Runoff Simulation Model) hydrological model. We tested this new approach with 12 events in the headwater catchments Körsch, Adenauer Bach and Fischbach in Germany. Results show that random forest regression performs the best among the four regression models. The BIC (Bayesian Information Criterion) score suggests that regressions considering antecedent RS SM can well infer soil water storage, resulting in R 2 of 0.85, 0.94 and 0.93 for the Körsch, Adenauer Bach and Fischbach catchments, respectively. Compared to the open loop (without data assimilation) simulations, our approach enhanced the general performance of event simulations with average KGE increases of 0.09, 0.24 and 0.33 for the Körsch, Adenauer Bach and Fischbach, respectively; and the mean error in the 12 simulated event peaks is reduced 15 %. Moreover, the simulation uncertainty is reduced, too. The transferability of the proposed approach to other RS products is also discussed. Although assimilating RS SM can enhance flash flood modeling, it is primarily affected by the uncertainty in precipitation. In the future, the proposed approach should be tested with more catchments and events to verify its general validity.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 648
Hohai University (CN), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE), Norsk Hydro (Germany) (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
0.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.