Teaching with worked examples – Why the selection of problems for exemplification is critical

• Selection of problems to exemplify influenced the ambiguity of worked examples. • Theoretically, detrimental as well as beneficial effects of ambiguity can be assumed. • Results consistently showed detrimental effects on learning. • Teachers should be careful when selecting problems to exemplify. Educational research has explored many aspects of the design of worked examples for teaching problem-solving skills but has yet to consider the influence of the problem itself that is chosen for exemplification. It is argued that the selection of problems to exemplify influences (meta-)comprehension since some problems lead to worked-out solutions that could be more or less ambiguous. Contrasting theories and findings are discussed which suggest both negative as well as positive effects of ambiguous examples on learning, at least when students are sufficiently supported to deal with that ambiguity. Study 1 (50 university students) confirmed that the selection of problems to exemplify impacts the ambiguity of examples. Studies 2–4 (90 university students; 100 university students; 142 high school students) showed that the groups receiving the problem that led to the more ambiguous example performed worse on the learning test, more often exhibited misconceptions, and overestimated their test performance. These effects were mostly large, consistent across learning topics (designating a factorial design and calculating the h -index), and even held on when learners received instructional support in the form of verbal explanations, which could have helped to disentangle the ambiguity. Amongst others, the results emphasize the need to pay more attention to the selection of problems for exemplification and consider an example’s ambiguity as an important feature for its effectiveness. In addition, they illustrate the preference of learners to follow examples over explanations, how misconceptions may arise, and the importance of guiding learners in early skill-acquisition phases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2024.102328
Primary Topic
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching with worked examples – Why the selection of problems for exemplification is critical

Günter Daniel Rey, Sebastian Victor Jansen, Sascha Schneider, Felix Krieglstein et al.
Contemporary Educational Psychology
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
article

Teaching with worked examples – Why the selection of problems for exemplification is critical

Günter Daniel Rey, Sebastian Victor Jansen, Sascha Schneider, Felix Krieglstein, Lukas Wesenberg
article en

Abstract

• Selection of problems to exemplify influenced the ambiguity of worked examples. • Theoretically, detrimental as well as beneficial effects of ambiguity can be assumed. • Results consistently showed detrimental effects on learning. • Teachers should be careful when selecting problems to exemplify. Educational research has explored many aspects of the design of worked examples for teaching problem-solving skills but has yet to consider the influence of the problem itself that is chosen for exemplification. It is argued that the selection of problems to exemplify influences (meta-)comprehension since some problems lead to worked-out solutions that could be more or less ambiguous. Contrasting theories and findings are discussed which suggest both negative as well as positive effects of ambiguous examples on learning, at least when students are sufficiently supported to deal with that ambiguity. Study 1 (50 university students) confirmed that the selection of problems to exemplify impacts the ambiguity of examples. Studies 2–4 (90 university students; 100 university students; 142 high school students) showed that the groups receiving the problem that led to the more ambiguous example performed worse on the learning test, more often exhibited misconceptions, and overestimated their test performance. These effects were mostly large, consistent across learning topics (designating a factorial design and calculating the h -index), and even held on when learners received instructional support in the form of verbal explanations, which could have helped to disentangle the ambiguity. Amongst others, the results emphasize the need to pay more attention to the selection of problems for exemplification and consider an example’s ambiguity as an important feature for its effectiveness. In addition, they illustrate the preference of learners to follow examples over explanations, how misconceptions may arise, and the importance of guiding learners in early skill-acquisition phases.

Contemporary Educational PsychologyVol. 80
University of Zurich (CH), Chemnitz University of Technology (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.