Dynamic Control Comparison: Tuned-PID vs Trained Reinforcement Learning of the Double Inverted Pendulum on a Two-Wheeled Platform

This study offers a thorough and comprehensive examination of the double-inverted pendulum system, employing both PID control and reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. Through meticulous evaluation, the research compares the efficacy of these methodologies in stabilizing the system's dynamic behaviors. The Stand-up Routine Test meticulously assesses various performance metrics, including response times, overshoot values, and settling times, elucidating RL control's superiority in terms of agility and stability over PID control. Furthermore, the exploration extends into the Circular Routine Test, where RL control demonstrates the potential for achieving faster completion times, highlighting its adaptability in dynamic scenarios. Despite inherent variability, RL control consistently outperforms PID control, indicating its promising applications. The study underscores the dynamic nature of control methodologies, emphasizing the imperative for ongoing experimentation to optimize performance and practical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of International Exchange and Innovation Conference on Engineering & Sciences (IEICES)
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5109/7323283
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Control Comparison: Tuned-PID vs Trained Reinforcement Learning of the Double Inverted Pendulum on a Two-Wheeled Platform

Ydron Paul C. Amarga, Re–Ann Cristine O. Calimpusan, Rudolph Joshua Candare, Sean Audie I. Buscano
Proceedings of International Exchange and Innovation Conference on Engineering & Sciences (IEICES)
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Dynamic Control Comparison: Tuned-PID vs Trained Reinforcement Learning of the Double Inverted Pendulum on a Two-Wheeled Platform

Ydron Paul C. Amarga, Re–Ann Cristine O. Calimpusan, Rudolph Joshua Candare, Sean Audie I. Buscano
article en

Abstract

This study offers a thorough and comprehensive examination of the double-inverted pendulum system, employing both PID control and reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. Through meticulous evaluation, the research compares the efficacy of these methodologies in stabilizing the system's dynamic behaviors. The Stand-up Routine Test meticulously assesses various performance metrics, including response times, overshoot values, and settling times, elucidating RL control's superiority in terms of agility and stability over PID control. Furthermore, the exploration extends into the Circular Routine Test, where RL control demonstrates the potential for achieving faster completion times, highlighting its adaptability in dynamic scenarios. Despite inherent variability, RL control consistently outperforms PID control, indicating its promising applications. The study underscores the dynamic nature of control methodologies, emphasizing the imperative for ongoing experimentation to optimize performance and practical implementation.

Proceedings of International Exchange and Innovation Conference on Engineering & Sciences (IEICES)Vol. 10
Caraga State University (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dynamic Control Comparison: Tuned-PID vs Trained Reinforcement Learning of the Double Inverted Pendulum on a Two-Wheeled Platform — Ydron Paul C. Amarga, Re–Ann Cristine O. Calimpusan, et al. · Proceedings of International Exchange and Innovation Conference on Engineering & Sciences (IEICES) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS