Understanding wind Energy Economic externalities impacts: A systematic literature review

Electricity generation from wind energy is one of the main drivers of decarbonization in energy systems. However, installing wind farm facilities may have beneficial and harmful impacts on the habitat of living beings. This study reviews the literature based on economic analysis to identify the main externalities related to the installation of wind farms and the economic methodologies used to assess these externalities, filling an existent literature gap. A systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items on Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis standards. A total of 33 studies were identified, most of them carried out in Europe. The studies cover 24 years, between 1998 and 2022. The externalities associated with wind electricity generation are classified into three categories: the impact on well-being, the impact of wind turbines, and the impacts of avoided externalities. Most studies (24 out of 33) determine economic values by stated preference methods through choice experiments, discrete choice experiments, and contingent valuation. Revealed preference methods were identified in 5 studies using hedonic pricing and travel cost techniques. The challenges and limitations of this analysis in terms of externalities identification and their assessment are also discussed, concluding that additional updated review studies are needed since the latest ones were published in 2016 and 2017. Moreover, it gives insights to policymakers and academics on a more complete approach they can use to evaluate the impacts of decarbonization, which, apart from the technological view, also considers and estimates the socio-economic and environmental perspectives. • Most of the studies on wind power were carried out in Europe. • There are several types of externalities in the literature. • Stated preference and revealed preference are the main methods. • The presence of a community representative increases project acceptance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.115120
Citations
19
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding wind Energy Economic externalities impacts: A systematic literature review

Anabela Botelho, Mara Madaleno, Mónica Meireles, Margarita Robaina et al.
19 citations
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
21.51
article

Understanding wind Energy Economic externalities impacts: A systematic literature review

Anabela Botelho, Mara Madaleno, Mónica Meireles, Margarita Robaina, Marta Ferreira Dias, Edimar Ramalho, Max López-Maciel, Fátima Lima, José Villar
article en
19 citations

Abstract

Electricity generation from wind energy is one of the main drivers of decarbonization in energy systems. However, installing wind farm facilities may have beneficial and harmful impacts on the habitat of living beings. This study reviews the literature based on economic analysis to identify the main externalities related to the installation of wind farms and the economic methodologies used to assess these externalities, filling an existent literature gap. A systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items on Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis standards. A total of 33 studies were identified, most of them carried out in Europe. The studies cover 24 years, between 1998 and 2022. The externalities associated with wind electricity generation are classified into three categories: the impact on well-being, the impact of wind turbines, and the impacts of avoided externalities. Most studies (24 out of 33) determine economic values by stated preference methods through choice experiments, discrete choice experiments, and contingent valuation. Revealed preference methods were identified in 5 studies using hedonic pricing and travel cost techniques. The challenges and limitations of this analysis in terms of externalities identification and their assessment are also discussed, concluding that additional updated review studies are needed since the latest ones were published in 2016 and 2017. Moreover, it gives insights to policymakers and academics on a more complete approach they can use to evaluate the impacts of decarbonization, which, apart from the technological view, also considers and estimates the socio-economic and environmental perspectives. • Most of the studies on wind power were carried out in Europe. • There are several types of externalities in the literature. • Stated preference and revealed preference are the main methods. • The presence of a community representative increases project acceptance.

Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsVol. 209
University of Lisbon (PT), INESC TEC (PT), University of Aveiro (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
21.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.