Managing the risk of continued operation with out‐of‐service safety instrumented system devices

Abstract Safety instrumented systems (SIS) are used to reduce the frequency of hazardous events in the process industry. When SIS equipment has a detected failure or requires online maintenance, the processing facility must decide whether to continue operation or shut down. Continued operation can pose risks beyond what was deemed acceptable as per the company's risk criteria. Understanding the peak risk is important to ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the risk and have compensating measures that ensure continued safe operation until the SIS equipment is returned to service. The paper proposes using Peak Risk Analysis (PRA) to identify unacceptable risks and to document the compensating measures required to support continued safe operation with out‐of‐service SIS equipment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety Progress
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12658
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing the risk of continued operation with out‐of‐service safety instrumented system devices

Angela E. Summers, Kedar Kottawar, Jyoti Sharma, Eloise Roche
Process Safety Progress
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

Managing the risk of continued operation with out‐of‐service safety instrumented system devices

Angela E. Summers, Kedar Kottawar, Jyoti Sharma, Eloise Roche
article en

Abstract

Abstract Safety instrumented systems (SIS) are used to reduce the frequency of hazardous events in the process industry. When SIS equipment has a detected failure or requires online maintenance, the processing facility must decide whether to continue operation or shut down. Continued operation can pose risks beyond what was deemed acceptable as per the company's risk criteria. Understanding the peak risk is important to ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the risk and have compensating measures that ensure continued safe operation until the SIS equipment is returned to service. The paper proposes using Peak Risk Analysis (PRA) to identify unacceptable risks and to document the compensating measures required to support continued safe operation with out‐of‐service SIS equipment.

Process Safety ProgressVol. 44(1)
Technical Solutions (United States) (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Managing the risk of continued operation with out‐of‐service safety instrumented system devices — Angela E. Summers, Kedar Kottawar, et al. · Process Safety Progress (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS