Exploring key safety terminology through simulation: Definitions and practical insights

Abstract Designing the process control of a system is a complex task that often involves different people. A uniform understanding of the terminology is necessary for the successful, resource‐saving implementation of the design. Therefore, this research aims at the definition and clarification of the key safety‐related concepts, including robustness, flexibility, sensitivity, fault tolerance, resilience, and nonfragile control. We first examine the definitions in academic literature and then analyze their differences. We utilize process engineering simulation examples to provide an in‐depth understanding of these distinctions. The significance of identifying and understanding the differences between these terms stems from their capacity to facilitate professional communication. Moreover, it makes it easier to deal with potential problems that might arise in real‐world scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Process Safety Progress
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12660
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring key safety terminology through simulation: Definitions and practical insights

Anselm Klose, Leon Urbas, Julius Lorenz, Helaleh Badrnoebashar
Process Safety Progress
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Exploring key safety terminology through simulation: Definitions and practical insights

Anselm Klose, Leon Urbas, Julius Lorenz, Helaleh Badrnoebashar
article en

Abstract

Abstract Designing the process control of a system is a complex task that often involves different people. A uniform understanding of the terminology is necessary for the successful, resource‐saving implementation of the design. Therefore, this research aims at the definition and clarification of the key safety‐related concepts, including robustness, flexibility, sensitivity, fault tolerance, resilience, and nonfragile control. We first examine the definitions in academic literature and then analyze their differences. We utilize process engineering simulation examples to provide an in‐depth understanding of these distinctions. The significance of identifying and understanding the differences between these terms stems from their capacity to facilitate professional communication. Moreover, it makes it easier to deal with potential problems that might arise in real‐world scenarios.

Process Safety ProgressVol. 44(1)
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Graduiertenakademie, Technische Universität Dresden
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.