A comparison of formulations and non-linear solvers for computational modelling of semiconductor devices

The drift-diffusion formulation, modelling semiconductor materials in terms of carrier densities and electric potential, is considered together with an alternative formulation in terms of dimensionless logarithmic quantities. Stability of both formulations in presence of sharp variations with a Galerkin Finite Element discretisation is assessed in two realistic problems: a <i>p</i>-<i>n</i> junction and an <i>n</i>-MOSFET device. The robustness with respect to the initial guess and the computational efficiency of the Newton-Raphson and Gummel non-linear solvers are also compared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Mechanics
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-024-02578-x
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of formulations and non-linear solvers for computational modelling of semiconductor devices

Sonia Fernández‐Méndez, Irene Arias, David Codony, Sergi Pérez-Escudero
1 citations
Computational Mechanics
Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
0.21
article

A comparison of formulations and non-linear solvers for computational modelling of semiconductor devices

Sonia Fernández‐Méndez, Irene Arias, David Codony, Sergi Pérez-Escudero
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The drift-diffusion formulation, modelling semiconductor materials in terms of carrier densities and electric potential, is considered together with an alternative formulation in terms of dimensionless logarithmic quantities. Stability of both formulations in presence of sharp variations with a Galerkin Finite Element discretisation is assessed in two realistic problems: a <i>p</i>-<i>n</i> junction and an <i>n</i>-MOSFET device. The robustness with respect to the initial guess and the computational efficiency of the Newton-Raphson and Gummel non-linear solvers are also compared.

Computational MechanicsVol. 75(5)
International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES)
Generalitat de Catalunya, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison of formulations and non-linear solvers for computational modelling of semiconductor devices — Sonia Fernández‐Méndez, Irene Arias, et al. · Computational Mechanics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS