A split morphosyntactic analysis of diminutives in two Arabic varieties

Contra the literature on Arabic prosodic morphology where templatic diminutive morphemes are often regarded as inflectional, this research paper argues for a distinction between their inflectional and derivational function in two Arabic varieties, i.e. Standard Arabic (SA) and Jordanian Arabic (JA), by offering a split analysis for these morphemes. It is demonstrated that the diminutive template C1u.C2ajC3 in SA and C1aC2.C2uuC3 in JA may enter the derivation under different heads. Under Size0, these templatic morphemes exhibit inflectional properties. In contrast, under n0, they yield idiosyncrasies. Cross-linguistically, the split analysis of the diminutive adds credence to the relatively recent literature that suggests that the diminutive is not morphosyntactically unique and can be located in different syntactic positions to serve different functions. Furthermore, either function indicates that SA and JA are grouped with languages that strictly categorize the diminutive as a syntactic head.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2431461
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.89
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A split morphosyntactic analysis of diminutives in two Arabic varieties

Linda Alkhawaja, Abdulazeez Jaradat
5 citations
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
13.89
article

A split morphosyntactic analysis of diminutives in two Arabic varieties

Linda Alkhawaja, Abdulazeez Jaradat
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Contra the literature on Arabic prosodic morphology where templatic diminutive morphemes are often regarded as inflectional, this research paper argues for a distinction between their inflectional and derivational function in two Arabic varieties, i.e. Standard Arabic (SA) and Jordanian Arabic (JA), by offering a split analysis for these morphemes. It is demonstrated that the diminutive template C1u.C2ajC3 in SA and C1aC2.C2uuC3 in JA may enter the derivation under different heads. Under Size0, these templatic morphemes exhibit inflectional properties. In contrast, under n0, they yield idiosyncrasies. Cross-linguistically, the split analysis of the diminutive adds credence to the relatively recent literature that suggests that the diminutive is not morphosyntactically unique and can be located in different syntactic positions to serve different functions. Furthermore, either function indicates that SA and JA are grouped with languages that strictly categorize the diminutive as a syntactic head.

Cogent Arts and HumanitiesVol. 11(1)
Al-Ahliyya Amman University (JO), Yarmouk University (JO)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
13.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.