Air Quality Estimation and Forecasting via Data Fusion With Uncertainty Quantification: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Results

Abstract Integrating air quality information from models, satellites, and in situ monitors allows for both better estimation of air quality and better quantification of uncertainties in this estimation. Uncertainty quantification is important to appropriately convey confidence in these estimates and forecasts to users who will base decisions on these. Uncertainty quantification also allows tracing the value of information provided by different data sources. This can identify gaps in the monitoring network where additional data could further reduce uncertainties. This paper presents a framework for data fusion with uncertainty quantification, applicable to multiple air‐quality‐relevant pollutants. Testing of this framework in the context of nitrogen dioxide forecasting at sub‐city scales shows promising results, with confidence intervals typically encompassing the expected number of actual measurements during cross‐validation. The framework is now being implemented into an online tool to support local air quality management decision‐making. Future work will also include the incorporation of low‐cost air sensor data and the quantification of uncertainty at hyper‐local scales.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jh000183
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.62

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air Quality Estimation and Forecasting via Data Fusion With Uncertainty Quantification: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Results

Nathan Pavlovic, Daniel King, K. Emma Knowland, Randall V. Martin et al.
3 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and Computation
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.62
article

Air Quality Estimation and Forecasting via Data Fusion With Uncertainty Quantification: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Results

Nathan Pavlovic, Daniel King, K. Emma Knowland, Randall V. Martin, Christoph A. Keller, Justin G. Coughlin, Stephen E. Cohn, Carl Malings
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Integrating air quality information from models, satellites, and in situ monitors allows for both better estimation of air quality and better quantification of uncertainties in this estimation. Uncertainty quantification is important to appropriately convey confidence in these estimates and forecasts to users who will base decisions on these. Uncertainty quantification also allows tracing the value of information provided by different data sources. This can identify gaps in the monitoring network where additional data could further reduce uncertainties. This paper presents a framework for data fusion with uncertainty quantification, applicable to multiple air‐quality‐relevant pollutants. Testing of this framework in the context of nitrogen dioxide forecasting at sub‐city scales shows promising results, with confidence intervals typically encompassing the expected number of actual measurements during cross‐validation. The framework is now being implemented into an online tool to support local air quality management decision‐making. Future work will also include the incorporation of low‐cost air sensor data and the quantification of uncertainty at hyper‐local scales.

Journal of Geophysical Research Machine Learning and ComputationVol. 1(4)
Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Sonoma Technology (United States) (US), Pacific Northwest Research Station (US), Swiss Re (Switzerland) (CH), Morgan State University (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
0.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.