An analysis of business students learning styles to improve the effectiveness of teaching methods

The study's goal is to assess the students' learning styles and analyze the impact of the lecturer's teaching methods in the business study program. The quasi-experimental approach was adopted in this investigation. This investigation used a non-equivalent control group design, with 552 undergraduate business students participating. Every respondent completed a questionnaire about their own learning style (pre-test and post-test) and rated the learning style that the lecturer had provided. After that, an independent sample t-test was used to determine the association between students' learning styles and the lecturer's teaching approaches. According to the findings of this study, the majority of students in the business program used a passive rather than active learning approach. Furthermore, the study discovered that active teaching methods were more beneficial for pupils with active learning styles than passive teaching methods for passive learners. There was no difference in learning styles between active and passive students under either teaching approach since the student groups had not previously been split based on learning styles. Understanding students' learning styles is critical for improving the accuracy of lecturers' teaching approaches during the teaching and learning process, especially in accounting. Other disciplines have conducted extensive research on evaluating students' learning styles and their relationship with lecturers' teaching approaches, but not in business in Indonesia. It has the potential to shed new light on business education and behavior.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2224
Primary Topic
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An analysis of business students learning styles to improve the effectiveness of teaching methods

Mahyuzar Rahman, Shuvo Kumar Mallik
International Journal of Science and Research Archive
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
article

An analysis of business students learning styles to improve the effectiveness of teaching methods

Mahyuzar Rahman, Shuvo Kumar Mallik
article en

Abstract

The study's goal is to assess the students' learning styles and analyze the impact of the lecturer's teaching methods in the business study program. The quasi-experimental approach was adopted in this investigation. This investigation used a non-equivalent control group design, with 552 undergraduate business students participating. Every respondent completed a questionnaire about their own learning style (pre-test and post-test) and rated the learning style that the lecturer had provided. After that, an independent sample t-test was used to determine the association between students' learning styles and the lecturer's teaching approaches. According to the findings of this study, the majority of students in the business program used a passive rather than active learning approach. Furthermore, the study discovered that active teaching methods were more beneficial for pupils with active learning styles than passive teaching methods for passive learners. There was no difference in learning styles between active and passive students under either teaching approach since the student groups had not previously been split based on learning styles. Understanding students' learning styles is critical for improving the accuracy of lecturers' teaching approaches during the teaching and learning process, especially in accounting. Other disciplines have conducted extensive research on evaluating students' learning styles and their relationship with lecturers' teaching approaches, but not in business in Indonesia. It has the potential to shed new light on business education and behavior.

International Journal of Science and Research ArchiveVol. 13(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.