Gaps in acute upper GI bleed (AUGIB) endoscopy training: a UK trainees and trainers’ survey
Introduction Trainees report inadequate exposure and training barriers in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed (AUGIB) endoscopic management. This UK-wide survey evaluated the experiences of trainees and trainers in AUGIB endoscopy training. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to UK upper GI endoscopy trainees and trainers in 2022–2023. Results We received responses from 137 trainees (23%) and 115 trainers (76%). Trainees reported higher exposure to diagnostic oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs) than AUGIB endoscopy (median 300, IQR 203–441 vs 15, IQR 2.5–35.5 lifetime procedures), with variations among grades and regions. Among trainees, 55% were specialist trainee (ST)3–5 and 28% ST6–7; 73% had Joint Advisory Group (JAG) certification for OGDs, and 32% attended a JAG-approved haemostasis course. For ST6–7 trainees, the highest lifetime procedure counts were for band ligation (median 20, IQR 8.5–39) and injection therapy (median 10, IQR 6.5–29.5); the lowest counts were for glue, over-the-scope clip and Danis stent (median 0). ≤41% of ST6–7 trainees felt confident in independent haemostatic procedures. Most trainees (68%) and trainers (64%) reported difficulties in AUGIB endoscopy training. Key barriers included lack of structured training (94% trainees), not being part of the AUGIB on-call rota (78% trainees and 72% trainers) and intensive acute-take commitments (75% trainees and 85% trainers). Suggested improvements included mandatory AUGIB on-call rota participation (89% trainees and 85% trainers), access to JAG-approved haemostasis courses (85% trainees and 84% trainers), simulation-based training (83% trainees and 72% trainers) and reduced acute-take commitments (80% trainees and trainers). Conclusion This survey highlights limited exposure to haemostasis procedures and low perceived competence among UK trainees. Addressing these challenges provides an opportunity for targeted improvements, ensuring a more comprehensive training experience.
Authors
- Sarah Hearnshaw
- Elizabeth Ratcliffe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6521-2133)
- Kathryn Oakland (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-1138)
- John Grant‐Casey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5166-4550)
- Adrian J. Stanley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9761-9795)
- Andrew Douds (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7870-7984)
- Simon P.L. Travis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2690-4361)
- Gaurav Nigam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4699-2263)
- Joanna Leithead (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9443-4552)
- Anna Marfin
- Allan J. Morris
Institutions
- NHS Blood and Transplant (GB)
- Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
- Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB)
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB)
- Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
- Forth Valley Royal Hospital (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
- Informa Healthcare (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontline Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2024-11-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2024-102818
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.78
Funders
- NHS Blood and Transplant