Gaps in acute upper GI bleed (AUGIB) endoscopy training: a UK trainees and trainers’ survey

Introduction Trainees report inadequate exposure and training barriers in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed (AUGIB) endoscopic management. This UK-wide survey evaluated the experiences of trainees and trainers in AUGIB endoscopy training. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to UK upper GI endoscopy trainees and trainers in 2022–2023. Results We received responses from 137 trainees (23%) and 115 trainers (76%). Trainees reported higher exposure to diagnostic oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs) than AUGIB endoscopy (median 300, IQR 203–441 vs 15, IQR 2.5–35.5 lifetime procedures), with variations among grades and regions. Among trainees, 55% were specialist trainee (ST)3–5 and 28% ST6–7; 73% had Joint Advisory Group (JAG) certification for OGDs, and 32% attended a JAG-approved haemostasis course. For ST6–7 trainees, the highest lifetime procedure counts were for band ligation (median 20, IQR 8.5–39) and injection therapy (median 10, IQR 6.5–29.5); the lowest counts were for glue, over-the-scope clip and Danis stent (median 0). ≤41% of ST6–7 trainees felt confident in independent haemostatic procedures. Most trainees (68%) and trainers (64%) reported difficulties in AUGIB endoscopy training. Key barriers included lack of structured training (94% trainees), not being part of the AUGIB on-call rota (78% trainees and 72% trainers) and intensive acute-take commitments (75% trainees and 85% trainers). Suggested improvements included mandatory AUGIB on-call rota participation (89% trainees and 85% trainers), access to JAG-approved haemostasis courses (85% trainees and 84% trainers), simulation-based training (83% trainees and 72% trainers) and reduced acute-take commitments (80% trainees and trainers). Conclusion This survey highlights limited exposure to haemostasis procedures and low perceived competence among UK trainees. Addressing these challenges provides an opportunity for targeted improvements, ensuring a more comprehensive training experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontline Gastroenterology
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/flgastro-2024-102818
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaps in acute upper GI bleed (AUGIB) endoscopy training: a UK trainees and trainers’ survey

Sarah Hearnshaw, Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Kathryn Oakland, John Grant‐Casey et al.
6 citations
Frontline Gastroenterology
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
2.78
article

Gaps in acute upper GI bleed (AUGIB) endoscopy training: a UK trainees and trainers’ survey

Sarah Hearnshaw, Elizabeth Ratcliffe, Kathryn Oakland, John Grant‐Casey, Adrian J. Stanley, Andrew Douds, Simon P.L. Travis, Gaurav Nigam, Joanna Leithead, Anna Marfin, Allan J. Morris
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Introduction Trainees report inadequate exposure and training barriers in acute upper gastrointestinal bleed (AUGIB) endoscopic management. This UK-wide survey evaluated the experiences of trainees and trainers in AUGIB endoscopy training. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to UK upper GI endoscopy trainees and trainers in 2022–2023. Results We received responses from 137 trainees (23%) and 115 trainers (76%). Trainees reported higher exposure to diagnostic oesophagogastroduodenoscopies (OGDs) than AUGIB endoscopy (median 300, IQR 203–441 vs 15, IQR 2.5–35.5 lifetime procedures), with variations among grades and regions. Among trainees, 55% were specialist trainee (ST)3–5 and 28% ST6–7; 73% had Joint Advisory Group (JAG) certification for OGDs, and 32% attended a JAG-approved haemostasis course. For ST6–7 trainees, the highest lifetime procedure counts were for band ligation (median 20, IQR 8.5–39) and injection therapy (median 10, IQR 6.5–29.5); the lowest counts were for glue, over-the-scope clip and Danis stent (median 0). ≤41% of ST6–7 trainees felt confident in independent haemostatic procedures. Most trainees (68%) and trainers (64%) reported difficulties in AUGIB endoscopy training. Key barriers included lack of structured training (94% trainees), not being part of the AUGIB on-call rota (78% trainees and 72% trainers) and intensive acute-take commitments (75% trainees and 85% trainers). Suggested improvements included mandatory AUGIB on-call rota participation (89% trainees and 85% trainers), access to JAG-approved haemostasis courses (85% trainees and 84% trainers), simulation-based training (83% trainees and 72% trainers) and reduced acute-take commitments (80% trainees and trainers). Conclusion This survey highlights limited exposure to haemostasis procedures and low perceived competence among UK trainees. Addressing these challenges provides an opportunity for targeted improvements, ensuring a more comprehensive training experience.

Frontline GastroenterologyVol. 16(2)
NHS Blood and Transplant (GB), Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB), Glasgow Royal Infirmary (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre (GB), Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (GB), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), Forth Valley Royal Hospital (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Informa Healthcare (GB)
NHS Blood and Transplant
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.