Potential impacts to human health from climate change: A comparative life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable devices flexible ureteroscopes

Climate change poses a significant global health challenge, with medical procedures contributing substantially to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Urology, as part of the broader healthcare sector, has begun integrating Planetary Health concepts to address this issue. While earlier studies have focused on Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of urological procedures, these evaluations remain data-dependent, and insights into intra-hospital emissions are limited. This study introduces a methodical approach for analyzing intra-institutional processes of LCA for single-use and reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). The LCA method was applied to assess the greenhouse gas emissions (CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents, CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) generated across the life cycle of fURS, including production, use-phase, reprocessing, maintenance, and disposal. The study approximated the Global Warming Potential (GWP) per one-hour use and evaluated associated health impacts using the ReCiPe2016(H) method, which measures Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Results showed that for reusable fURS, assuming 133 usages per device and maintenance after every 11th use, each application generated 1.24 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, equivalent to 1.15E-06 DALYs. In contrast, single-use fURS generated 4.93 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq and 4.57E-06 DALYs per application. The production and reprocessing stages were identified as having the greatest environmental and health impacts. For reusable fURS, electricity required during refurbishment and use phases was a key contributor, whereas the production phase accounted for most of the impact in single-use devices. Overall, singleuse fURS had a substantially higher potential environmental and health impact than their reusable counterparts. This study underscores the environmental and health impacts of ureterorenoscopy and highlights the importance of incorporating Planetary Health principles into healthcare practices. It provides a foundation for further analyses and research, aiming to drive transformative action in the healthcare sector toward sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urolithiasis
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01664-2
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Potential impacts to human health from climate change: A comparative life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable devices flexible ureteroscopes

Igor Tsaur, Jörg Hennenlotter, Marlene Thöne, Steffen Rausch et al.
10 citations
Urolithiasis
Climate Change and Health Impacts
3.15
article

Potential impacts to human health from climate change: A comparative life-cycle assessment of single-use versus reusable devices flexible ureteroscopes

Igor Tsaur, Jörg Hennenlotter, Marlene Thöne, Steffen Rausch, Matthias Saar, Jan Lask, Arnulf Stenzl
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Climate change poses a significant global health challenge, with medical procedures contributing substantially to CO<sub>2</sub> emissions. Urology, as part of the broader healthcare sector, has begun integrating Planetary Health concepts to address this issue. While earlier studies have focused on Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of urological procedures, these evaluations remain data-dependent, and insights into intra-hospital emissions are limited. This study introduces a methodical approach for analyzing intra-institutional processes of LCA for single-use and reusable flexible ureterorenoscopes (fURS). The LCA method was applied to assess the greenhouse gas emissions (CO<sub>2</sub> equivalents, CO<sub>2</sub>-eq) generated across the life cycle of fURS, including production, use-phase, reprocessing, maintenance, and disposal. The study approximated the Global Warming Potential (GWP) per one-hour use and evaluated associated health impacts using the ReCiPe2016(H) method, which measures Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs). Results showed that for reusable fURS, assuming 133 usages per device and maintenance after every 11th use, each application generated 1.24 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq, equivalent to 1.15E-06 DALYs. In contrast, single-use fURS generated 4.93 kg CO<sub>2</sub>-eq and 4.57E-06 DALYs per application. The production and reprocessing stages were identified as having the greatest environmental and health impacts. For reusable fURS, electricity required during refurbishment and use phases was a key contributor, whereas the production phase accounted for most of the impact in single-use devices. Overall, singleuse fURS had a substantially higher potential environmental and health impact than their reusable counterparts. This study underscores the environmental and health impacts of ureterorenoscopy and highlights the importance of incorporating Planetary Health principles into healthcare practices. It provides a foundation for further analyses and research, aiming to drive transformative action in the healthcare sector toward sustainability.

UrolithiasisVol. 52(1)
University of Hohenheim (DE), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE), University of Tübingen (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
3.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.