Hermetic bags remain effective in minimizing storage loss after four successive cycles of reuse in Mexican highlands

Maize and beans are two important crops in Mexico that are heavily infested by insect pests during storage, which can cause significant damage and jeopardize the food security of smallholder farmers. The effectiveness of polypropylene bags in minimizing storage loss was compared to the effectiveness of four hermetic bags from three different manufacturers (GrainPro Inc., USA; Ecotact, India; Vestergaard Frandsen Inc., Switzerland) and the effectiveness of silage plastic bags. The assessment was performed on maize and bean grain during four different cycles of storage for three months using the same hermetic bags. The bags were repaired with tape when perforated by insects to assess the effect on storage loss of reusing hermetic bags during consecutive storage cycles. Data were collected on the number of holes per bag, moisture content, insect damage, and weight loss before and after each storage cycle. All bags were perforated after the first cycle of storage; the silage plastic bag was the most affected and had to be changed after the second storage cycle. These perforations were caused by the activity of insects inside the bags in their attempt to escape the low-oxygen conditions created by the bags’ airtightness. Polypropylene bags showed severe insect damage, reaching 15.6% during the second storage cycle. Hermetic bags, on the other hand, consistently maintained a moisture content below 13%, insect damage below 5%, and weight loss below 2%, even after being perforated by insects and repaired. All the hermetic bags tested are recommended for use by smallholders to minimize storage loss. Repairing and reusing hermetic bags is a good strategy that can help minimize storage loss while reducing costs and the impact of the use of plastic materials on the environment. • Effectiveness of 5 storage technologies compared during four consecutive cycles. • Grain damage during storage in Mexican's highlands was low during the experiments. • Hermetic bags from different brands similarly minimize grain loss during storage. • Perforated hermetic bags repaired with tape still maintain low storage loss. • Perforated silage plastic bags are less effective than hermetic bags during storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Stored Products Research
Published
2024-11-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspr.2024.102480
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hermetic bags remain effective in minimizing storage loss after four successive cycles of reuse in Mexican highlands

Nele Verhulst, Sylvanus Odjo, Abel Saldivia Tejeda, Jessica González Regalado et al.
3 citations
Journal of Stored Products Research
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
1.63
article

Hermetic bags remain effective in minimizing storage loss after four successive cycles of reuse in Mexican highlands

Nele Verhulst, Sylvanus Odjo, Abel Saldivia Tejeda, Jessica González Regalado, Mariel Guera
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Maize and beans are two important crops in Mexico that are heavily infested by insect pests during storage, which can cause significant damage and jeopardize the food security of smallholder farmers. The effectiveness of polypropylene bags in minimizing storage loss was compared to the effectiveness of four hermetic bags from three different manufacturers (GrainPro Inc., USA; Ecotact, India; Vestergaard Frandsen Inc., Switzerland) and the effectiveness of silage plastic bags. The assessment was performed on maize and bean grain during four different cycles of storage for three months using the same hermetic bags. The bags were repaired with tape when perforated by insects to assess the effect on storage loss of reusing hermetic bags during consecutive storage cycles. Data were collected on the number of holes per bag, moisture content, insect damage, and weight loss before and after each storage cycle. All bags were perforated after the first cycle of storage; the silage plastic bag was the most affected and had to be changed after the second storage cycle. These perforations were caused by the activity of insects inside the bags in their attempt to escape the low-oxygen conditions created by the bags’ airtightness. Polypropylene bags showed severe insect damage, reaching 15.6% during the second storage cycle. Hermetic bags, on the other hand, consistently maintained a moisture content below 13%, insect damage below 5%, and weight loss below 2%, even after being perforated by insects and repaired. All the hermetic bags tested are recommended for use by smallholders to minimize storage loss. Repairing and reusing hermetic bags is a good strategy that can help minimize storage loss while reducing costs and the impact of the use of plastic materials on the environment. • Effectiveness of 5 storage technologies compared during four consecutive cycles. • Grain damage during storage in Mexican's highlands was low during the experiments. • Hermetic bags from different brands similarly minimize grain loss during storage. • Perforated hermetic bags repaired with tape still maintain low storage loss. • Perforated silage plastic bags are less effective than hermetic bags during storage.

Journal of Stored Products ResearchVol. 110
Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.